MICHAEL CHEN KANG HUANG AND ANOTHER v. PETER LIT MA
Defendant failed the first hurdle by not providing a full and frank account of his finances and his evidence of a partial proprietary interest was bald and unsubstantiated; plaintiffs demonstrated a strong proprietary claim to the frozen funds and Flat F; exercising the court's discretion, release of funds or permission to withdraw HK$5,000/week would cause substantial injustice to plaintiffs, so applications to vary and to set aside the statutory demand were refused and plaintiffs' summons to prohibit withdrawals was allowed.
- Citation
- MICHAEL CHEN KANG HUANG AND ANOTHER v. PETER LIT MA
- Parties
- Applicant (judgment Debtor); Defendant in HCA 218/2005: PETER LIT MA; 1st Respondent; 1st Judgment Creditor; 1st Plaintiff in HCA 218/2005: MICHAEL CHEN KANG HUANG; 2nd Respondent; 2nd Judgment Creditor; 2nd Plaintiff in HCA 218/2005: EUROMAT WORLDWIDE LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 27 August 2007
- Case Number
- HCA218/2005
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand; Variation of Mareva (freezing) Injunction; Underlying Civil Action for Deceit, Fraudulent Misrepresentation and Money Had and Received / Hearing and Judgment on Applications (heard 21 August 2007; Reasons Handed Down 27 August 2007)
- Outcome
- Application to set aside statutory demand dismissed; defendant's summons to vary Mareva order dismissed; plaintiffs' summons to remove permission for HK$5,000 weekly withdrawals allowed; costs awarded to plaintiffs to be taxed on a party and party basis.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Demand, Mareva Injunction, Proprietary Claim to Frozen Funds, Setting Aside Statutory Demand, Variation of Freezing Order, Full and Frank Disclosure, Costs Assessment
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PETER LIT MA
Applicant (judgment Debtor); Defendant in HCA 218/2005
MICHAEL CHEN KANG HUANG
1st Respondent; 1st Judgment Creditor; 1st Plaintiff in HCA 218/2005
EUROMAT WORLDWIDE LIMITED
2nd Respondent; 2nd Judgment Creditor; 2nd Plaintiff in HCA 218/2005
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand; Variation of Mareva (freezing) Injunction; Underlying Civil Action for Deceit, Fraudulent Misrepresentation and Money Had and Received / Hearing and Judgment on Applications (heard 21 August 2007; Reasons Handed Down 27 August 2007)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the statutory demand should be set aside
- 2 Whether the defendant should be permitted to use frozen assets to fund legal costs or living expenses
- 3 Whether the defendant has given a full and frank account of his finances (first hurdle from Ostrich Farming)
Ratio Decidendi
Defendant failed the first hurdle by not providing a full and frank account of his finances and his evidence of a partial proprietary interest was bald and unsubstantiated; plaintiffs demonstrated a strong proprietary claim to the frozen funds and Flat F; exercising the court's discretion, release of funds or permission to withdraw HK$5,000/week would cause substantial injustice to plaintiffs, so applications to vary and to set aside the statutory demand were refused and plaintiffs' summons to prohibit withdrawals was allowed.
Court Disposition
Application to set aside statutory demand dismissed; defendant's summons to vary Mareva order dismissed; plaintiffs' summons to remove permission for HK$5,000 weekly withdrawals allowed; costs awarded to plaintiffs to be taxed on a party and party basis.
Orders
- Dismissed application HCSD 9/2007 to set aside statutory demand dated 31 January 2007
- Dismissed defendant's summons dated 12 April 2007 seeking further variation to permit sale of Flat F and release of funds
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment