RE CHAN WAI MING RAYMOND
Bankruptcy orders were made because the debtors did not repay sums demanded, the statutory demands were not defective despite alleged over‑claiming of time‑barred interest, the debtors failed to prove a bona fide cross‑claim of undervalue or prejudice from delay, and disputes over interest and application of sale proceeds are matters for the Official Receiver on proof of debt.
- Citation
- RE CHAN WAI MING RAYMOND
- Parties
- Petitioner: TED (Judgment Creditor); Debtor: Unnamed Debtor 1; Debtor: Unnamed Debtor 2
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2014
- Case Number
- HCB5342/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Petition / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- bankruptcy orders made against both debtors
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Demand, Enforcement of Judgment, Auction Sale, Set Off, Limitation Period, Cross Claim, Valuation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TED (Judgment Creditor)
Petitioner
Unnamed Debtor 1
Debtor
Unnamed Debtor 2
Debtor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Petition / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Are statutory demands defective because they claim time-barred interest?
- 2 Does the debtor have a bona fide cross-claim that the secured property was sold at an undervalue?
- 3 Should sale proceeds have been applied to principal before interest?
Ratio Decidendi
Bankruptcy orders were made because the debtors did not repay sums demanded, the statutory demands were not defective despite alleged over‑claiming of time‑barred interest, the debtors failed to prove a bona fide cross‑claim of undervalue or prejudice from delay, and disputes over interest and application of sale proceeds are matters for the Official Receiver on proof of debt.
Court Disposition
bankruptcy orders made against both debtors
Orders
- Bankruptcy order made against both debtors
- Attendance of the Official Receiver excused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment