RE MANN, KEVIN PATRICK

RE MANN, KEVIN PATRICK

The bank was entitled to the usual bankruptcy order because the statutory demands were not complied with, the Bank proved the debt, the debtors failed to demonstrate a bona fide defence on substantial grounds or that the Australian litigation offered a realistic timetable or prospect to repay the Bank, and the government guarantee did not make the Bank a secured creditor nor obligate it to pursue the government first; therefore adjournment or dismissal was refused and bankruptcy orders made.

Citation
RE MANN, KEVIN PATRICK
Parties
Petitioner/creditor: The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited; Debtor: Mann, Kevin Patrick; Debtor: Li, Chung Yan Hilda
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
24 March 2015
Case Number
HCB8023/2013
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Petition / Hearing — Judgment (usual Bankruptcy Order and Costs Order Nisi)
Outcome
Usual bankruptcy order to be made against Kevin Patrick Mann and Chung Yan Hilda Li; order nisi for costs in favour of the Bank.
Legal Topics
Statutory Demand, Bankruptcy Petition, Bona Fide Defence on Substantial Grounds, Special Loan Guarantee Scheme, Substituted Service, Adjournment/stay
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited

Petitioner/creditor

Mann, Kevin Patrick

Debtor

Li, Chung Yan Hilda

Debtor

Procedural Posture

Bankruptcy Petition / Hearing — Judgment (usual Bankruptcy Order and Costs Order Nisi)

  1. 1 Whether the petitions should be adjourned or stayed pending foreign litigation and recovery under third‑party government guarantee
  2. 2 Whether the petitioning creditor is a secured creditor for purposes of the Bankruptcy Ordinance because of the government guarantee
  3. 3 Whether the debt is bona fide disputed on substantial grounds by the debtors such that the petitions should be dismissed

Ratio Decidendi

The bank was entitled to the usual bankruptcy order because the statutory demands were not complied with, the Bank proved the debt, the debtors failed to demonstrate a bona fide defence on substantial grounds or that the Australian litigation offered a realistic timetable or prospect to repay the Bank, and the government guarantee did not make the Bank a secured creditor nor obligate it to pursue the government first; therefore adjournment or dismissal was refused and bankruptcy orders made.

Court Disposition

Usual bankruptcy order to be made against Kevin Patrick Mann and Chung Yan Hilda Li; order nisi for costs in favour of the Bank.

Orders

  • Usual bankruptcy order against Kevin Patrick Mann and Chung Yan Hilda Li
  • Order nisi that costs of each Petition, including all costs reserved, be to The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited