RE MANN, KEVIN PATRICK
The bank was entitled to the usual bankruptcy order because the statutory demands were not complied with, the Bank proved the debt, the debtors failed to demonstrate a bona fide defence on substantial grounds or that the Australian litigation offered a realistic timetable or prospect to repay the Bank, and the government guarantee did not make the Bank a secured creditor nor obligate it to pursue the government first; therefore adjournment or dismissal was refused and bankruptcy orders made.
- Citation
- RE MANN, KEVIN PATRICK
- Parties
- Petitioner/creditor: The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited; Debtor: Mann, Kevin Patrick; Debtor: Li, Chung Yan Hilda
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 24 March 2015
- Case Number
- HCB8023/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Petition / Hearing — Judgment (usual Bankruptcy Order and Costs Order Nisi)
- Outcome
- Usual bankruptcy order to be made against Kevin Patrick Mann and Chung Yan Hilda Li; order nisi for costs in favour of the Bank.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Demand, Bankruptcy Petition, Bona Fide Defence on Substantial Grounds, Special Loan Guarantee Scheme, Substituted Service, Adjournment/stay
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited
Petitioner/creditor
Mann, Kevin Patrick
Debtor
Li, Chung Yan Hilda
Debtor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Petition / Hearing — Judgment (usual Bankruptcy Order and Costs Order Nisi)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petitions should be adjourned or stayed pending foreign litigation and recovery under third‑party government guarantee
- 2 Whether the petitioning creditor is a secured creditor for purposes of the Bankruptcy Ordinance because of the government guarantee
- 3 Whether the debt is bona fide disputed on substantial grounds by the debtors such that the petitions should be dismissed
Ratio Decidendi
The bank was entitled to the usual bankruptcy order because the statutory demands were not complied with, the Bank proved the debt, the debtors failed to demonstrate a bona fide defence on substantial grounds or that the Australian litigation offered a realistic timetable or prospect to repay the Bank, and the government guarantee did not make the Bank a secured creditor nor obligate it to pursue the government first; therefore adjournment or dismissal was refused and bankruptcy orders made.
Court Disposition
Usual bankruptcy order to be made against Kevin Patrick Mann and Chung Yan Hilda Li; order nisi for costs in favour of the Bank.
Orders
- Usual bankruptcy order against Kevin Patrick Mann and Chung Yan Hilda Li
- Order nisi that costs of each Petition, including all costs reserved, be to The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment