FAN YUXI v. LINBIAO TANG AND OTHERS
The 4th defendant failed to demonstrate sufficient grounds or a real prospect of success to justify a stay of execution; the plaintiff's undertaking to hold the judgment sum in the solicitor's client account pending appeal was fair, reasonable and adequate, so the court made the garnishee order absolute, varied the injunction to permit enforcement and dismissed the 4th defendant's summons with costs.
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 3598
- Parties
- Plaintiff (judgment Creditor): FAN YUXI; 1st Defendant: LINBIAO TANG; 2nd Defendant: HE WEI; 3rd Defendant: YANG LIFEN; 4th Defendant (judgment Debtor): WANG LI WEI; 5th Defendant: LIU BIN; 6th Defendant: DAI ZHIWEI; 7th Defendant: CHAN KIN YAN; 8th Defendant: CHEN XIANGPEI; 9th Defendant: QIANMING HUANG; 10th Defendant: JUNCAI WU; 11th Defendant: MA WUSUMENI; 12th Defendant: YANG JIANHUA; 13th Defendant: ZHOU BINGQIU; 14th Defendant: YU ZHANGPING; 15th Defendant: LIN SONGMAO; 16th Defendant (discontinued): UNION DUTY-FREE LIMITED; 17th Defendant: CHEN GUI YING; 18th Defendant: CHEN XIAOYING; 19th Defendant: XUE RIZHONG; 20th Defendant: XIANHUI TRADING CO., LIMITED; 21st Defendant: TWHW AUTO LIMITED; 22nd Defendant: AN XIAOTUAN; 23rd Defendant: SU MING; 24th Defendant (discontinued): LU WAN-JU; 25th Defendant (discontinued): LIN SHENG-HSIEN; 26th Defendant: XIONG LIWEN; 27th Defendant (discontinued): STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CO LTD; 28th Defendant: HK MANTIANXING TRADE LIMITED; 29th Defendant: TXY TRADE LIMITED; 30th Defendant: SONG JUENA; 31st Defendant: HU HAISONG
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 2 November 2021
- Case Number
- HCA2032/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Enforcement (garnishee and Stay of Execution Application) / Chambers Hearing on Application for Stay of Execution and Variation of Injunction
- Outcome
- Garnishee order nisi made absolute; 4th defendant's summons dismissed; injunction varied; costs awarded to plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Garnishee Order, Undertaking to Court, Variation of Injunction, Costs, Real Prospect Test
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
FAN YUXI
Plaintiff (judgment Creditor)
LINBIAO TANG
1st Defendant
HE WEI
2nd Defendant
YANG LIFEN
3rd Defendant
WANG LI WEI
4th Defendant (judgment Debtor)
LIU BIN
5th Defendant
DAI ZHIWEI
6th Defendant
CHAN KIN YAN
7th Defendant
CHEN XIANGPEI
8th Defendant
QIANMING HUANG
9th Defendant
JUNCAI WU
10th Defendant
MA WUSUMENI
11th Defendant
YANG JIANHUA
12th Defendant
ZHOU BINGQIU
13th Defendant
YU ZHANGPING
14th Defendant
LIN SONGMAO
15th Defendant
UNION DUTY-FREE LIMITED
16th Defendant (discontinued)
CHEN GUI YING
17th Defendant
CHEN XIAOYING
18th Defendant
XUE RIZHONG
19th Defendant
XIANHUI TRADING CO., LIMITED
20th Defendant
TWHW AUTO LIMITED
21st Defendant
AN XIAOTUAN
22nd Defendant
SU MING
23rd Defendant
LU WAN-JU
24th Defendant (discontinued)
LIN SHENG-HSIEN
25th Defendant (discontinued)
XIONG LIWEN
26th Defendant
STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CO LTD
27th Defendant (discontinued)
HK MANTIANXING TRADE LIMITED
28th Defendant
TXY TRADE LIMITED
29th Defendant
SONG JUENA
30th Defendant
HU HAISONG
31st Defendant
Procedural Posture
Enforcement (garnishee and Stay of Execution Application) / Chambers Hearing on Application for Stay of Execution and Variation of Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a stay of execution should be granted pending appeal
- 2 Whether the garnishee order nisi should be made absolute
- 3 Whether the 4th defendant demonstrated real prospects of success to set aside the judgment
Ratio Decidendi
The 4th defendant failed to demonstrate sufficient grounds or a real prospect of success to justify a stay of execution; the plaintiff's undertaking to hold the judgment sum in the solicitor's client account pending appeal was fair, reasonable and adequate, so the court made the garnishee order absolute, varied the injunction to permit enforcement and dismissed the 4th defendant's summons with costs.
Court Disposition
Garnishee order nisi made absolute; 4th defendant's summons dismissed; injunction varied; costs awarded to plaintiff
Orders
- The garnishee order nisi is made absolute.
- Upon the plaintiff's undertaking as set out in paragraph 5 of the plaintiff's counsel's skeleton submission, the injunction granted ex parte on 3 December 2020 and continued on 11 December 2020, 8 January 2021, 29 January 2021 and 7 September 2021 is varied to enable enforcement of the garnishee order absolute.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment