BANK OF QINGDAO CO LTD v. OOO SECURITIES (HK) GROUP LTD (formerly known as ORIENTIERT XYZ SECURITIES LTD, AMTD GLOBAL MARKETS LTD and AMTD ASSET MANAGEMENT LTD
The Master dismissed the stay application because the court had jurisdiction to hear it, the Defendant's appeal lacked a reasonable prospect of success on the key issues (the proper construction of the Unless Order and the merits of the Amendments), and the Defendant failed to demonstrate serious irreparable prejudice such that the appeal would be rendered nugatory; accordingly no good reason existed to deprive the Plaintiff of the fruits of its successful application to amend and costs were ordered against the Defendant.
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 775
- Parties
- Plaintiff (consolidated Action by Leading Action): BANK OF QINGDAO CO., LTD. 青島銀行股份有限公司; Defendant (consolidated Action by Leading Action): ooo securities (HK) group limited (formerly known as orientiert xyz securities limited, amtd global markets limited 尚乘環球市場有限公司 and amtd asset management limited尚乘資產管理有限公司)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2025
- Case Number
- HCA1141/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Stay of Execution of Interlocutory Order Following Grant of Leave to Amend Statement of Claim / Master's Decision on Stay Application (paper Disposal) Post Order, Pre Appeal
- Outcome
- Stay Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Amendment of Pleadings, Unless Order, Appeal, Discovery
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BANK OF QINGDAO CO., LTD. 青島銀行股份有限公司
Plaintiff (consolidated Action by Leading Action)
ooo securities (HK) group limited (formerly known as orientiert xyz securities limited, amtd global markets limited 尚乘環球市場有限公司 and amtd asset management limited尚乘資產管理有限公司)
Defendant (consolidated Action by Leading Action)
Procedural Posture
Application for Stay of Execution of Interlocutory Order Following Grant of Leave to Amend Statement of Claim / Master's Decision on Stay Application (paper Disposal) Post Order, Pre Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction to determine the stay application
- 2 Whether the Amendment Summons was barred by the Unless Order
- 3 Whether the proposed Amendments to the Statement of Claim should be allowed
Ratio Decidendi
The Master dismissed the stay application because the court had jurisdiction to hear it, the Defendant's appeal lacked a reasonable prospect of success on the key issues (the proper construction of the Unless Order and the merits of the Amendments), and the Defendant failed to demonstrate serious irreparable prejudice such that the appeal would be rendered nugatory; accordingly no good reason existed to deprive the Plaintiff of the fruits of its successful application to amend and costs were ordered against the Defendant.
Court Disposition
Stay Application dismissed
Orders
- Stay Application dismissed.
- The Defendant do pay to the Plaintiff the costs of the Stay Application on a party and party basis with a certificate for one counsel only, to be summarily assessed and payable forthwith.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment