SHUN KAI FINANCE CO LTD (In Compulsory Liquidation) AND OTHERS v. JAPAN LEASING (HONG KONG) LIMITED (In Creditors\' Voluntary Liquidation)
The 3rd plaintiff's claim was struck out because she abandoned reflective loss claims and in any event failed to plead a special relationship or assumption of responsibility necessary to recover pure economic loss; non‑physical emotional distress damages were not recoverable on the pleaded facts; the proposed re‑amendments disclosed no reasonable cause of action and leave to amend was refused.
- Citation
- SHUN KAI FINANCE CO LTD (In Compulsory Liquidation) AND OTHERS v. JAPAN LEASING (HONG KONG) LIMITED (In Creditors\' Voluntary Liquidation)
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff (in Compulsory Liquidation): Shun Kai Finance Company Limited; 2nd Plaintiff: Wong Shun; 3rd Plaintiff: Yeung Pui Ying Anna; Defendant (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation): Japan Leasing (Hong Kong) Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2008
- Case Number
- HCA13826/1998
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action – Tort and Contractual Claims (negligence, Estoppel, Procurement of Breach) / Interlocutory Applications: Defendant's Strike Out Application and Plaintiff's Summons to Re Amend; Decision on 30 September 2008
- Outcome
- Amended Statement of Claim and Particulars of Damage struck out as against the 3rd plaintiff; 3rd plaintiff's action dismissed; 3rd plaintiff's summons to re‑amend dismissed; costs ordered nisi in favour of defendant.
- Legal Topics
- Strike Out, Reflective Loss, Pure Economic Loss, Emotional Distress Damages, Assumption of Responsibility, Duty of Care, Leave to Amend
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shun Kai Finance Company Limited
1st Plaintiff (in Compulsory Liquidation)
Wong Shun
2nd Plaintiff
Yeung Pui Ying Anna
3rd Plaintiff
Japan Leasing (Hong Kong) Limited
Defendant (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation)
Procedural Posture
Civil Action – Tort and Contractual Claims (negligence, Estoppel, Procurement of Breach) / Interlocutory Applications: Defendant's Strike Out Application and Plaintiff's Summons to Re Amend; Decision on 30 September 2008
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Amended Statement of Claim discloses a reasonable cause of action
- 2 Whether the 3rd plaintiff can recover pure economic loss from the defendant
- 3 Whether the 3rd plaintiff can recover reflective loss as a shareholder
Ratio Decidendi
The 3rd plaintiff's claim was struck out because she abandoned reflective loss claims and in any event failed to plead a special relationship or assumption of responsibility necessary to recover pure economic loss; non‑physical emotional distress damages were not recoverable on the pleaded facts; the proposed re‑amendments disclosed no reasonable cause of action and leave to amend was refused.
Court Disposition
Amended Statement of Claim and Particulars of Damage struck out as against the 3rd plaintiff; 3rd plaintiff's action dismissed; 3rd plaintiff's summons to re‑amend dismissed; costs ordered nisi in favour of defendant.
Orders
- Strike out the Amended Statement of Claim and the Particulars of Damage as against the 3rd plaintiff
- Dismiss the 3rd plaintiff\u2019s action against the defendant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment