CHAN WAI MING AND ANOTHER v. CHAN WAI LUN AND OTHERS
Because the facts were hotly disputed and spanned a long period such that laches could not be safely determined interlocutorily, the striking out application was dismissed but the appeal allowing conversion to continue as if begun by writ was allowed to secure the discipline of pleadings and proper case management.
- Citation
- CHAN WAI MING AND ANOTHER v. CHAN WAI LUN AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: CHAN WAI MING; 2nd Plaintiff: CHAN WAI CHIU; 1st Defendant: CHAN WAI LUN; 2nd Defendant: THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF MAN SO; 3rd Defendant: THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF CHAN KING HO; 4th Defendant: CHAN TSUN HO; 5th Defendant: CHAN WAI CHEONG; 6th Defendant: CHAN WAI MAN; 7th Defendant: CHAN PING HO; 8th Defendant: CHAN SIU HO
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 12 March 1999
- Case Number
- HCMP775/1995
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Proceedings (estate) / Judgment on Interlocutory Appeal (striking Out Application and Application to Continue as If Begun by Writ)
- Outcome
- 1st Defendant's striking out application dismissed; 1st Defendant's appeal allowed in part to order that proceedings continue as if begun by writ; case remitted to follow directions for pleadings and costs orders.
- Legal Topics
- Striking Out, Laches, Continuation as If Begun by Writ, Pleadings, Directions, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHAN WAI MING
1st Plaintiff
CHAN WAI CHIU
2nd Plaintiff
CHAN WAI LUN
1st Defendant
THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF MAN SO
2nd Defendant
THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF CHAN KING HO
3rd Defendant
CHAN TSUN HO
4th Defendant
CHAN WAI CHEONG
5th Defendant
CHAN WAI MAN
6th Defendant
CHAN PING HO
7th Defendant
CHAN SIU HO
8th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Proceedings (estate) / Judgment on Interlocutory Appeal (striking Out Application and Application to Continue as If Begun by Writ)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proceedings should be struck out for delay/laches
- 2 Whether the proceedings should be ordered to continue as if begun by writ
- 3 Whether laches can be resolved at interlocutory stage
Ratio Decidendi
Because the facts were hotly disputed and spanned a long period such that laches could not be safely determined interlocutorily, the striking out application was dismissed but the appeal allowing conversion to continue as if begun by writ was allowed to secure the discipline of pleadings and proper case management.
Court Disposition
1st Defendant's striking out application dismissed; 1st Defendant's appeal allowed in part to order that proceedings continue as if begun by writ; case remitted to follow directions for pleadings and costs orders.
Orders
- Proceedings ordered to continue as if begun by writ.
- Plaintiffs to file and serve Statement of Claim within 21 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment