SU ORKUN v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD / NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE [Decision on Leave Application]

SU ORKUN v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD / NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE [Decision on Leave Application]

The application for leave was dismissed because the applicant voluntarily withdrew the leave application and there was nothing outstanding in the action; dismissal was the correct disposal in accordance with Re Manik Md Mahamudun Nabi [2022] HKCA 471.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] HKCFI 1801
Parties
Applicant: Su Orkun; Putative Respondent: Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office; Putative Interested Party: Director of Immigration
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
30 July 2024
Case Number
HCAL1022/2023
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (leave Application) / Leave Application Dismissed Following Applicant's Voluntary Withdrawal
Outcome
Leave to apply for judicial review dismissed.
Legal Topics
Non Refoulement, Torture Claims Appeal, Judicial Review Leave, Withdrawal of Proceedings, Refusal of Protection
Source Language
en
Constitutional and Administrative Law Immigration Law Human Rights Non Refoulement Torture Claims Appeal Judicial Review Leave Withdrawal of Proceedings Refusal of Protection

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Su Orkun

Applicant

Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office

Putative Respondent

Director of Immigration

Putative Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review (leave Application) / Leave Application Dismissed Following Applicant's Voluntary Withdrawal

  1. 1 Whether leave should be granted for judicial review of the Torture Claims Appeal Board decision
  2. 2 Effect of applicant's voluntary withdrawal on the proper disposition of the leave application
  3. 3 Whether dismissal is appropriate when there is nothing outstanding in the action

Ratio Decidendi

The application for leave was dismissed because the applicant voluntarily withdrew the leave application and there was nothing outstanding in the action; dismissal was the correct disposal in accordance with Re Manik Md Mahamudun Nabi [2022] HKCA 471.

Court Disposition

Leave to apply for judicial review dismissed.

Orders

  • Leave to apply for Judicial Review be dismissed.