YOUNG\'S ENGINEERING CO. LTD. v. HANG SING CONSTRUTION CO. LTD.

YOUNG\'S ENGINEERING CO. LTD. v. HANG SING CONSTRUTION CO. LTD.

The Court concluded there is no statutory basis under s.48 and no demonstrated equitable jurisdiction to award interest on a sum ordered repaid on appeal; accordingly the application for interest was dismissed. The Court also held that the costs of the garnishee proceedings would not be set aside because they...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
YOUNG\'S ENGINEERING CO. LTD. v. HANG SING CONSTRUTION CO. LTD.
Parties
Plaintiff (respondent): Young's Engineering Co. Ltd.; Defendant (appellant): Hang Sing Construction Co. Ltd.
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
25 January 1985
Case Number
CACV154/1984
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal From Summary Judgment (court of Appeal)
Outcome
Application for payment of interest dismissed; application to set aside costs of garnishee proceedings refused; unconditional leave to defend on appeal previously granted and sum ordered repaid.
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Garnishee Proceedings, Interest on Repayment, Equitable Jurisdiction, Statutory Jurisdiction (s.48 Supreme Court Ordinance)
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Equity Garnishment Appeals Summary Judgment Garnishee Proceedings Interest on Repayment Equitable Jurisdiction +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Young's Engineering Co. Ltd.

Plaintiff (respondent)

Hang Sing Construction Co. Ltd.

Defendant (appellant)

Procedural Posture

Civil / Appeal From Summary Judgment (court of Appeal)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether this Court has statutory jurisdiction to award interest on a sum ordered repaid on appeal
  2. 2 Whether there is an equitable jurisdiction to award interest in these circumstances
  3. 3 Whether the costs of the garnishee proceedings should be set aside

Ratio Decidendi

The Court concluded there is no statutory basis under s.48 and no demonstrated equitable jurisdiction to award interest on a sum ordered repaid on appeal; accordingly the application for interest was dismissed. The Court also held that the costs of the garnishee proceedings would not be set aside because they resulted from the defendant's failure to pay.

Court Disposition

Application for payment of interest dismissed; application to set aside costs of garnishee proceedings refused; unconditional leave to defend on appeal previously granted and sum ordered repaid.

Orders

  • Unconditional leave to defend granted on appeal and sum paid to plaintiff ordered to be repaid.
  • Application for payment of interest on the sum in the plaintiff's possession dismissed.