CHINAVEST II-A, L.P. v. CHAN KUENG UN, ROY

CHINAVEST II-A, L.P. v. CHAN KUENG UN, ROY

The Court held that the Disbursement Agent validly exercised the contractual option to declare all sums due and payable, that the plaintiff could pursue the claim as representative of the sellers under Order 15 r.12, and that any procedural defect in the plaintiff's form of action was cured by ordering joinder of all sellers; accordingly the Order 14 summary judgment was upheld and the appeal dismissed.

Citation
CHINAVEST II-A, L.P. v. CHAN KUENG UN, ROY
Parties
Plaintiff (respondent): CHINAVEST II-A, L.P.; Defendant (appellant): CHAN KUENG UN, ROY
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
8 October 1998
Case Number
CACV145/1998
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal From Order 14 Summary Judgment / Court of Appeal Hearing and Judgment (8 October 1998)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; Order 14 summary judgment upheld; all sellers to be joined as plaintiffs; no order as to costs.
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Order 14 RHC, Order 15 R.12 RHC, Joinder of Parties, Authority to Accelerate Debt, Representative Action
Source Language
EN
Contract Civil Procedure Agency Representative Proceedings Summary Judgment Order 14 RHC Order 15 R.12 RHC Joinder of Parties +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

CHINAVEST II-A, L.P.

Plaintiff (respondent)

CHAN KUENG UN, ROY

Defendant (appellant)

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal From Order 14 Summary Judgment / Court of Appeal Hearing and Judgment (8 October 1998)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Disbursement Agent validly exercised the option under Clause 2.2 to declare all sums immediately due and payable
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff was properly constituted to sue in its own name or as representative of the sellers
  3. 3 Whether proceedings could be maintained under Order 15 r.12 as representative proceedings and whether joinder of all sellers was required

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the Disbursement Agent validly exercised the contractual option to declare all sums due and payable, that the plaintiff could pursue the claim as representative of the sellers under Order 15 r.12, and that any procedural defect in the plaintiff's form of action was cured by ordering joinder of all sellers; accordingly the Order 14 summary judgment was upheld and the appeal dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; Order 14 summary judgment upheld; all sellers to be joined as plaintiffs; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.
  • Order 14 judgment in favour of the plaintiff for US$3,700,000 (with interest and costs) upheld.