YU WING CHEONG alias YU JOSEPH WING CHEONG, Executor substituted named in the Will of YAU SIN WAH alias YAU KAM LAN (“Deceased”) AND ANOTHER v. YU WING YIN
Leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal was refused because the proposed grounds merely re‑ran arguments already rejected below, raised no question of general or public importance, and failed to identify any arguable error of law or triable issue: summary judgment was properly granted as the defendant's...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] HKCA 1706
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff; Executor Substituted Named in the Will of the Deceased: YU WING CHEONG; 2nd Plaintiff; Executor Substituted Named in the Will of the Deceased: YU WING KIT; Defendant (acting in Person): YU WING YIN
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 16 November 2022
- Case Number
- CACV270/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Final Appeal From a Judgment of the Court of Appeal in a Civil Matter Concerning Administration of an Estate / Leave to Appeal to the Court of Final Appeal Refused by Court of Appeal Judgment Dated 16 November 2022
- Outcome
- Notice of Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal refused; application dismissed; costs awarded to plaintiffs on an indemnity basis
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Sale of Estate Property, Vacant Possession, Equitable Tenants in Common, Promissory/equitable Estoppel, Collective Sale for Redevelopment, Section 54 Probate and Administration Ordinance, Burden of Proof in Summary Proceedings, Indemnity Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
YU WING CHEONG
1st Plaintiff; Executor Substituted Named in the Will of the Deceased
YU WING KIT
2nd Plaintiff; Executor Substituted Named in the Will of the Deceased
YU WING YIN
Defendant (acting in Person)
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Final Appeal From a Judgment of the Court of Appeal in a Civil Matter Concerning Administration of an Estate / Leave to Appeal to the Court of Final Appeal Refused by Court of Appeal Judgment Dated 16 November 2022
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal
- 2 Whether the summary judgment below was wrongly decided or raised triable issues
- 3 Whether the defendant has an equitable interest as a tenant in common preventing sale
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal was refused because the proposed grounds merely re‑ran arguments already rejected below, raised no question of general or public importance, and failed to identify any arguable error of law or triable issue: summary judgment was properly granted as the defendant's asserted equitable interests and estoppel claims lacked sufficient evidence or particulars and there was no evidence of an imminent collective sale; the application amounted to abuse of process and costs were awarded on an indemnity basis.
Court Disposition
Notice of Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal refused; application dismissed; costs awarded to plaintiffs on an indemnity basis
Orders
- Notice of Motion dismissed and leave to appeal refused
- Costs of the application to be paid by the defendant to the plaintiffs to be assessed summarily on an indemnity basis
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment