PARKIE TRADING LTD. AND ANOTHER v. WONG TSUN TSUN THAI KITCHEN LTD. AND OTHERS
The court held that the Guangzhou proceedings did not constitute a transaction set-off or counterclaim sufficient to defeat summary judgment or justify unconditional leave to defend; the 1st Defendant's appeal was dismissed and no interim stay of execution was granted. However the court found the 3rd Defendant's defence on the cheques raised an arguable point on consideration that could not be finally determined on summary judgment, allowed the 3rd Defendant's appeal, set aside the judgment on the cheques and granted unconditional leave to defend; the 2nd Defendant's appeal was dismissed.
- Citation
- PARKIE TRADING LTD. AND ANOTHER v. WONG TSUN TSUN THAI KITCHEN LTD. AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: PARKIE TRADING LIMITED; 2nd Plaintiff: LUI YU KAN; 1st Defendant: WONG TSUN TSUN THAI KITCHEN LIMITED; 2nd Defendant: CAN FINE LIMITED; 3rd Defendant: WONG PUI MAN
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 1997
- Case Number
- HCA1462/1996
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (summary Judgment; Contract and Negotiable Instruments) / Appeal From Master Woolley in Court of First Instance (order 14 Appeal)
- Outcome
- 1st Defendant's appeal dismissed; 2nd Defendant's appeal dismissed; 3rd Defendant's appeal allowed in part — judgment on cheques set aside and 3rd Defendant given unconditional leave to defend; no interim stay of execution granted.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Counterclaim, Stay of Execution, Independent Vs Transaction Set Off, Consideration for Cheque, Foreign Proceedings Affecting Domestic Execution
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PARKIE TRADING LIMITED
1st Plaintiff
LUI YU KAN
2nd Plaintiff
WONG TSUN TSUN THAI KITCHEN LIMITED
1st Defendant
CAN FINE LIMITED
2nd Defendant
WONG PUI MAN
3rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (summary Judgment; Contract and Negotiable Instruments) / Appeal From Master Woolley in Court of First Instance (order 14 Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether foreign proceedings alleging wrongful eviction constitute a counterclaim or set-off entitling defendants to unconditional leave to defend or a stay of execution
- 2 Whether an interim stay of execution pending the outcome of foreign proceedings should be granted
- 3 Whether the payee of dishonoured cheques (2nd Plaintiff) furnished consideration sufficient to sue on the cheques
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the Guangzhou proceedings did not constitute a transaction set-off or counterclaim sufficient to defeat summary judgment or justify unconditional leave to defend; the 1st Defendant's appeal was dismissed and no interim stay of execution was granted. However the court found the 3rd Defendant's defence on the cheques raised an arguable point on consideration that could not be finally determined on summary judgment, allowed the 3rd Defendant's appeal, set aside the judgment on the cheques and granted unconditional leave to defend; the 2nd Defendant's appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
1st Defendant's appeal dismissed; 2nd Defendant's appeal dismissed; 3rd Defendant's appeal allowed in part — judgment on cheques set aside and 3rd Defendant given unconditional leave to defend; no interim stay of execution granted.
Orders
- Dismissed appeal of 1st Defendant
- Dismissed appeal of 2nd Defendant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment