FINE GOOD LTD AND ANOTHER v. STATEMART INVESTMENTS LTD AND ANOTHER

FINE GOOD LTD AND ANOTHER v. STATEMART INVESTMENTS LTD AND ANOTHER

Relief from the unless-order sanction was granted in part because granting relief caused little or no prejudice while refusing it would deprive defendants of a last chance; however voluminous exhibits of pre-sale agreements were expunged. On the merits, defendants failed to disclose bona fide triable issues: the Letter of Instructions, Loan Agreement and subsequent supplemental instruments and Consent Letter evidenced that plaintiffs held Fullvision and the Hong Kong subsidiaries as security and were entitled to apply sale proceeds, thereby defeating the defendants' claim under Clause 12.7; the alleged set-off for delay lacked particulars and legal foundation given defaults and...

Citation
FINE GOOD LTD AND ANOTHER v. STATEMART INVESTMENTS LTD AND ANOTHER
Parties
1st Plaintiff: Fine Good Limited; 2nd Plaintiff: Billport Investments Limited; 1st Defendant: Statesmart Investments Limited; 2nd Defendant: Mr Liu
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
16 May 2013
Case Number
HCA1190/2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Summary Judgment Application (order 14) / Hearing and Judgment on Order 14 Summons; Related Applications for Relief From Sanction and to Amend Defence
Outcome
Summary judgment granted for plaintiffs; defendants granted relief from sanction in part; voluminous exhibit LTS-2 expunged; application to amend adjourned
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Unless Order, Relief From Sanctions, Set Off, Interpretation of Interrelated Loan/security Documents, Declaration for Application of Sale Proceeds
Source Language
EN
Contract Civil Procedure Equity Guarantee and Security Debt Recovery Summary Judgment Unless Order Relief From Sanctions +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fine Good Limited

1st Plaintiff

Billport Investments Limited

2nd Plaintiff

Statesmart Investments Limited

1st Defendant

Mr Liu

2nd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Summary Judgment Application (order 14) / Hearing and Judgment on Order 14 Summons; Related Applications for Relief From Sanction and to Amend Defence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether defendants should be relieved from the sanction of an unless order for failing to file evidence in time
  2. 2 Whether defendants disclosed triable issues to defeat summary judgment under Order 14
  3. 3 Whether interposed documents (Letter of Instructions, Loan Agreement and supplements, Consent Letter, Deed of Acknowledgment) displaced the contractual provision relied on by defendants (Clause 12.7)

Ratio Decidendi

Relief from the unless-order sanction was granted in part because granting relief caused little or no prejudice while refusing it would deprive defendants of a last chance; however voluminous exhibits of pre-sale agreements were expunged. On the merits, defendants failed to disclose bona fide triable issues: the Letter of Instructions, Loan Agreement and subsequent supplemental instruments and Consent Letter evidenced that plaintiffs held Fullvision and the Hong Kong subsidiaries as security and were entitled to apply sale proceeds, thereby defeating the defendants' claim under Clause 12.7; the alleged set-off for delay lacked particulars and legal foundation given defaults and...

Court Disposition

Summary judgment granted for plaintiffs; defendants granted relief from sanction in part; voluminous exhibit LTS-2 expunged; application to amend adjourned

Orders

  • Summary judgment granted in terms of the Order 14 summons for the Updated Remaining Sums with interest and declaration as to entitlement to apply Sale Proceeds as sought by plaintiffs
  • Defendants' summons for relief from sanction granted in terms of paragraphs 1, 2, 4 and 5 of their summons dated 10 April 2013