GOLDEN RICH FINANCE LTD v. LAM SAU FA

GOLDEN RICH FINANCE LTD v. LAM SAU FA

The court found Golden Rich had made out a prima facie case and the defendant failed to raise any credible triable issues: the recording and contemporaneous documents rebut the alleged syndicate and fraud; the identified MLO breaches were either immaterial or remediable (HK$13,000 to be deducted under s.27(4)); accordingly summary judgment was entered for Golden Rich and the consolidation summons dismissed.

Citation
[2018] HKCFI 572
Parties
Plaintiff (hcmp 84/2017); Defendant (hca 3248/2016): Golden Rich Finance Limited; Defendant (hcmp 84/2017); Plaintiff (hca 3248/2016): Madam Lam
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
21 March 2018
Case Number
HCMP84/2017
Procedural Posture
Mortgagee Proceeding (originating Summons) and Related High Court Civil Action (writ) / Substantive Hearing of Originating Summons for Summary Judgment; Interlocutory Summons for Consolidation Dismissed
Outcome
Judgment entered for Golden Rich Finance Limited; Summons for consolidation dismissed; costs awarded to Golden Rich on an indemnity basis with summary assessment
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Enforceability of Legal Charge, Money Lenders Ordinance Compliance, Alleged Conspiracy/undue Influence, Costs (indemnity)
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Golden Rich Finance Limited

Plaintiff (hcmp 84/2017); Defendant (hca 3248/2016)

Madam Lam

Defendant (hcmp 84/2017); Plaintiff (hca 3248/2016)

Procedural Posture

Mortgagee Proceeding (originating Summons) and Related High Court Civil Action (writ) / Substantive Hearing of Originating Summons for Summary Judgment; Interlocutory Summons for Consolidation Dismissed

  1. 1 Whether the First Legal Charge and Loan Agreement are enforceable
  2. 2 Whether allegations of a syndicate/conspiracy vitiate the mortgage transaction
  3. 3 Whether breaches of the Money Lenders Ordinance (ss.7,18(2)(j),21,27) render the agreement unenforceable

Ratio Decidendi

The court found Golden Rich had made out a prima facie case and the defendant failed to raise any credible triable issues: the recording and contemporaneous documents rebut the alleged syndicate and fraud; the identified MLO breaches were either immaterial or remediable (HK$13,000 to be deducted under s.27(4)); accordingly summary judgment was entered for Golden Rich and the consolidation summons dismissed.

Court Disposition

Judgment entered for Golden Rich Finance Limited; Summons for consolidation dismissed; costs awarded to Golden Rich on an indemnity basis with summary assessment

Orders

  • Judgment entered for Golden Rich Finance Limited for all monies due under the First Legal Charge and for delivery of vacant possession of the Mortgaged Property
  • Summons dated 5 May 2017 for consolidation dismissed