SMITH FREEHILLS (A FIRM) v. CHEN TE KUANG MIKE AND ANOTHER
The retainer terms established monthly billing payable within 30 days and authorising monthly bills as final in their own right; on the facts each monthly bill was a final bill. The first bill had been paid and more than 12 months had elapsed so the Court had no power to allow taxation of it. The clients had bona fide objections to the remaining eight bills and the solicitors' partial failure to comply with the Code of Conduct (Chapter 4.12) constituted special circumstances justifying leave to tax those bills; the Court therefore granted leave to tax the eight bills subject to procedural conditions and stayed the O.14 action pending taxation.
- Citation
- SMITH FREEHILLS (A FIRM) v. CHEN TE KUANG MIKE AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff (hca 3071/2015); Defendant (hcmp 1275/2016): Herbert Smith Freehills (a firm); 1st Defendant (hca 3071/2015) and 1st Plaintiff (hcmp 1275/2016): Chen Te Kuang Mike; 2nd Defendant (hca 3071/2015) and 2nd Plaintiff (hcmp 1275/2016): Chen Te-Ming
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 2016
- Case Number
- HCA3071/2015
- Procedural Posture
- Solicitors' Claim for Unpaid Bills (summary Judgment O.14) and Clients' Originating Summons for Leave to Tax Under Section 67 of the Legal Practitioners Ordinance / Combined Hearing on O.14 Summary Judgment and Taxation Application; Decision on Leave to Tax and Related Procedural and Costs Orders by Registrar
- Outcome
- Application to tax the first bill refused; leave granted to tax the remaining eight bills under conditions; O.14 summary judgment proceeding stayed and action stayed pending taxation; costs orders made in favour of the clients in part.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment (o.14), Taxation of Solicitor's Bill, Legal Practitioners Ordinance Section 67, Retainer Terms and Final Vs Interim Bills, Professional Conduct Obligations (code of Conduct), Costs Allocation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Herbert Smith Freehills (a firm)
Plaintiff (hca 3071/2015); Defendant (hcmp 1275/2016)
Chen Te Kuang Mike
1st Defendant (hca 3071/2015) and 1st Plaintiff (hcmp 1275/2016)
Chen Te-Ming
2nd Defendant (hca 3071/2015) and 2nd Plaintiff (hcmp 1275/2016)
Procedural Posture
Solicitors' Claim for Unpaid Bills (summary Judgment O.14) and Clients' Originating Summons for Leave to Tax Under Section 67 of the Legal Practitioners Ordinance / Combined Hearing on O.14 Summary Judgment and Taxation Application; Decision on Leave to Tax and Related Procedural and Costs Orders by Registrar
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether each monthly bill was a final bill or interim bill (affecting s67 categorisation)
- 2 Whether clients are entitled to leave to tax under s67 and whether special circumstances exist
- 3 Whether the first bill is taxable given payment and passage of time
Ratio Decidendi
The retainer terms established monthly billing payable within 30 days and authorising monthly bills as final in their own right; on the facts each monthly bill was a final bill. The first bill had been paid and more than 12 months had elapsed so the Court had no power to allow taxation of it. The clients had bona fide objections to the remaining eight bills and the solicitors' partial failure to comply with the Code of Conduct (Chapter 4.12) constituted special circumstances justifying leave to tax those bills; the Court therefore granted leave to tax the eight bills subject to procedural conditions and stayed the O.14 action pending taxation.
Court Disposition
Application to tax the first bill refused; leave granted to tax the remaining eight bills under conditions; O.14 summary judgment proceeding stayed and action stayed pending taxation; costs orders made in favour of the clients in part.
Orders
- Application to tax Bill 1 refused (no power to tax paid bill after >12 months)
- Leave granted to clients to tax Bills 2–9 (eight bills)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment