RE LEE PRISCILLA HWANG
The trustees proved multiple heads of unsatisfactory conduct and failure to co-operate: the bankrupts opposed US Chapter 15 and Turnover proceedings thereby obstructing trustees' access to US assets; post‑petition payments via OCHKL amounted to void preferential transactions; Raymond recharacterised amounts to avoid inclusion in his estate; Raymond failed to obtain and provide the GSA; both failed to disclose salary/benefits. These findings satisfied s 30A(4) and, on balancing creditors' interests and the gravity and consequences of the conduct, the court exercised its discretion to suspend the running of the discharge period (Raymond 18 months, Priscilla 15 months from 30 August 2013)...
- Citation
- RE LEE PRISCILLA HWANG
- Parties
- Trustee (applicant): John Robert Lees; Trustee (applicant): Mat Ng; Bankrupt (respondent): Lee Priscilla Hwang; Bankrupt (respondent): Lee Raymond Cho-Min
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 9 May 2014
- Case Number
- HCB7452/2009
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy (application Under S 30 A(3) Bankruptcy Ordinance) / Hearing and Decision on Suspension of Discharge Period and Costs
- Outcome
- Application partly granted: suspension of running of discharge period ordered against both bankrupts and costs awarded to trustees
- Legal Topics
- Suspension of Automatic Discharge, Trustee Powers and Turnover, Non Cooperation With Trustees, Chapter 15 Recognition, Voidable Post Petition Transactions
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Robert Lees
Trustee (applicant)
Mat Ng
Trustee (applicant)
Lee Priscilla Hwang
Bankrupt (respondent)
Lee Raymond Cho-Min
Bankrupt (respondent)
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy (application Under S 30 A(3) Bankruptcy Ordinance) / Hearing and Decision on Suspension of Discharge Period and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether trustees established grounds under s 30A(4) to suspend automatic discharge under s 30A(3)
- 2 Whether the bankrupts' pre- and post-bankruptcy conduct amounted to unsatisfactory conduct not to be condoned
- 3 Whether oppositions in US Chapter 15 and Turnover proceedings and recharacterisation of debts constituted failure to co-operate with trustees
Ratio Decidendi
The trustees proved multiple heads of unsatisfactory conduct and failure to co-operate: the bankrupts opposed US Chapter 15 and Turnover proceedings thereby obstructing trustees' access to US assets; post‑petition payments via OCHKL amounted to void preferential transactions; Raymond recharacterised amounts to avoid inclusion in his estate; Raymond failed to obtain and provide the GSA; both failed to disclose salary/benefits. These findings satisfied s 30A(4) and, on balancing creditors' interests and the gravity and consequences of the conduct, the court exercised its discretion to suspend the running of the discharge period (Raymond 18 months, Priscilla 15 months from 30 August 2013)...
Court Disposition
Application partly granted: suspension of running of discharge period ordered against both bankrupts and costs awarded to trustees
Orders
- Relevant period to cease to run for Raymond Lee for 18 months commencing 30 August 2013
- Relevant period to cease to run for Priscilla Lee for 15 months commencing 30 August 2013
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment