SUTIMAH v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD/NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE [Decision on Leave Application]

SUTIMAH v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD/NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE [Decision on Leave Application]

Leave to apply for judicial review was refused because the applicant failed to demonstrate any reasonable prospect of success: the Board's factual findings were final, the claim was unsubstantiated as a purely domestic dispute without state involvement, and internal relocation was available.

Citation
[2019] HKCFI 2989
Parties
Applicant: Sutimah; Putative Respondent: Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office; Putative Interested Party: Director of Immigration
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
11 December 2019
Case Number
HCAL1617/2018
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review / Leave Application Refused
Outcome
Leave to apply for judicial review refused; application dismissed
Legal Topics
Non Refoulement, Torture Risk, Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (cidtp), Judicial Review, Leave to Apply for Judicial Review, Procedural Fairness, Internal Relocation
Source Language
EN
Constitutional and Administrative Law Immigration Law Human Rights Refugee Law Non Refoulement Torture Risk Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (cidtp) Judicial Review +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sutimah

Applicant

Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office

Putative Respondent

Director of Immigration

Putative Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review / Leave Application Refused

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant had a fair hearing before the Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office
  2. 2 Whether the Board's findings of fact are final and not subject to re-examination on judicial review
  3. 3 Whether the applicant established a real risk of torture, death or CIDTP if returned

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to apply for judicial review was refused because the applicant failed to demonstrate any reasonable prospect of success: the Board's factual findings were final, the claim was unsubstantiated as a purely domestic dispute without state involvement, and internal relocation was available.

Court Disposition

Leave to apply for judicial review refused; application dismissed

Orders

  • Leave to apply for judicial review refused
  • Application dismissed