LAU KOON YING MATTHEW as the Executor of the estate of LAU YIU WING, deceased (“the Deceased”) v. LAU TARK WING AND ANOTHER
Defendant Lau Tark Wing failed to provide truthful, contemporaneous accounts and is liable to repay the Father's sale proceeds of HK$1,084,617 and amounts of rental proceeds as calculated by the Plaintiff; no deduction is allowed for construction costs absent proof; compound interest is appropriate for the period and sums to be determined; costs awarded to the Plaintiff for the taking of account.
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 995
- Parties
- Plaintiff; Executor of the Estate of Lau Yiu Wing (deceased): Lau Koon Ying Matthew; 1st Defendant: Lau Tark Wing; 2nd Defendant (executor): Lau Tark Wing (as executor of the estate of Tang Mei Ho); Defendant (company): Wing Hing Resources Limited; Defendant (company): Caba Resources Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 2019
- Case Number
- HCAP23/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Probate and High Court Actions (taking of Account Post Trial) / Post Judgment Taking of Account Hearing
- Outcome
- Taking of account ordered; defendant liable to repay sale proceeds and rental proceeds as quantified in court's assessment; no credit for construction costs; compound interest awarded; costs to plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Taking of Account, Breach of Trust, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Compound Interest, Rental and Sale Proceeds Accounting, Construction Cost Deductions, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lau Koon Ying Matthew
Plaintiff; Executor of the Estate of Lau Yiu Wing (deceased)
Lau Tark Wing
1st Defendant
Lau Tark Wing (as executor of the estate of Tang Mei Ho)
2nd Defendant (executor)
Wing Hing Resources Limited
Defendant (company)
Caba Resources Limited
Defendant (company)
Procedural Posture
Probate and High Court Actions (taking of Account Post Trial) / Post Judgment Taking of Account Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 What are the principles governing a taking of account after a trial finding of breach of trust/fiduciary duty?
- 2 How were the Sale Proceeds dealt with and what sum is repayable to the Father's estate?
- 3 What are the gross Rental Proceeds received by defendants and what permissible deductions (if any) apply?
Ratio Decidendi
Defendant Lau Tark Wing failed to provide truthful, contemporaneous accounts and is liable to repay the Father's sale proceeds of HK$1,084,617 and amounts of rental proceeds as calculated by the Plaintiff; no deduction is allowed for construction costs absent proof; compound interest is appropriate for the period and sums to be determined; costs awarded to the Plaintiff for the taking of account.
Court Disposition
Taking of account ordered; defendant liable to repay sale proceeds and rental proceeds as quantified in court's assessment; no credit for construction costs; compound interest awarded; costs to plaintiff
Orders
- An account to be taken of the Father's share of the Sale Proceeds and of Rental Proceeds in accordance with the court's findings
- Defendant Lau Tark Wing to repay the Father's share of Sale Proceeds in the sum of HK$1,084,617 with interest to be determined (compound interest awarded)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment