TAM HON LEUNG v. NG WAI HING AND OTHERS
The plaintiff was an independent contractor of the 1st Defendant but all three Defendants (1st, 2nd and 3rd) were concurrent occupiers and owed common law and statutory duties under the Occupier's Liability Ordinance; they each breached the duty to ensure a ground guide/checker during operation of a front loader (Eagle) and the 2nd Defendant's driver failed to take adequate care; defendants are jointly and severally liable; plaintiff's damages reduced by 25% for contributory negligence.
- Citation
- TAM HON LEUNG v. NG WAI HING AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Tam Hon Leung; 1st Defendant: Ng Wai Hing and Chim Wai Ming trading as Professional Engineering Company; 2nd Defendant: Gallantly Limited; 3rd Defendant: Hoi Kong Container Services Co. Ltd
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 2006
- Case Number
- HCPI1176/2003
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injuries Action / Judgment (court of First Instance)
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Plaintiff against the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Defendants (jointly and severally liable).
- Legal Topics
- Employment Status (employee V Independent Contractor), Duty of Care of Concurrent Occupiers, Statutory Duty Under Occupier's Liability Ordinance, Causation and Breach, Quantum and Apportionment of Damages
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tam Hon Leung
Plaintiff
Ng Wai Hing and Chim Wai Ming trading as Professional Engineering Company
1st Defendant
Gallantly Limited
2nd Defendant
Hoi Kong Container Services Co. Ltd
3rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injuries Action / Judgment (court of First Instance)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiff was an employee of the 1st Defendant or an independent contractor
- 2 Whether each Defendant breached duties of care (common law negligence and statutory occupier's duty)
- 3 Whether contributory negligence by the plaintiff reduces damages
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff was an independent contractor of the 1st Defendant but all three Defendants (1st, 2nd and 3rd) were concurrent occupiers and owed common law and statutory duties under the Occupier's Liability Ordinance; they each breached the duty to ensure a ground guide/checker during operation of a front loader (Eagle) and the 2nd Defendant's driver failed to take adequate care; defendants are jointly and severally liable; plaintiff's damages reduced by 25% for contributory negligence.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Plaintiff against the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Defendants (jointly and severally liable).
Orders
- Damages awarded in aggregate before reduction: HKD 2,637,431.22
- Reduce damages by 25% for contributory negligence: HKD 659,357.81
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment