WONG WAI LUN AND ANOTHER v. TAM LUEN WAI
The defendant's denials and alternative agency plea were unsupported by credible evidence and amounted to mere assertions; the evidence of the plaintiffs and former assistant operation manager Cheung was credible, the defendant's alleged standard practices were disbelieved, and no evidence negated personal liability as agent; accordingly plaintiffs were entitled to summary judgment for the proven sum and defendant was given unconditional leave to defend only as to the specific disputed $8,500.
- Citation
- WONG WAI LUN AND ANOTHER v. TAM LUEN WAI
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: WONG WAI LUN; 2nd Plaintiff: WONG HOU KWUN; Defendant: TAM LUEN WAI
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 9 December 2005
- Case Number
- DCCJ6826/2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Debt/contract Action / Summary Judgment Application and Judgment at First Instance
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiffs for HKD 178,063 with interest at judgment rate from date of writ until payment; unconditional leave to defend in respect of HKD 8,500; costs to plaintiffs (costs order nisi) including reserved costs with certificate for counsel.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Authority of Agent, Authenticity of Documents, Leave to Defend, Credibility of Witnesses, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
WONG WAI LUN
1st Plaintiff
WONG HOU KWUN
2nd Plaintiff
TAM LUEN WAI
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Debt/contract Action / Summary Judgment Application and Judgment at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the work was performed and materials supplied as invoiced
- 2 Whether the disputed invoices and maintenance contract are authentic and attributable to the defendant
- 3 Whether the defendant acted only as agent for disclosed principals thereby avoiding personal liability
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant's denials and alternative agency plea were unsupported by credible evidence and amounted to mere assertions; the evidence of the plaintiffs and former assistant operation manager Cheung was credible, the defendant's alleged standard practices were disbelieved, and no evidence negated personal liability as agent; accordingly plaintiffs were entitled to summary judgment for the proven sum and defendant was given unconditional leave to defend only as to the specific disputed $8,500.
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiffs for HKD 178,063 with interest at judgment rate from date of writ until payment; unconditional leave to defend in respect of HKD 8,500; costs to plaintiffs (costs order nisi) including reserved costs with certificate for counsel.
Orders
- Judgment for plaintiffs in the sum of HKD 178063
- Interest at judgment rate from the date of the writ until payment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment