香港特別行政區 訴 鄧沅璋
The Court held the sentence of 14 years 2 months was appropriate; the one-third guilty plea discount had been applied and there were no additional mitigating factors on the record to justify further reduction, so the leave application was dismissed.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 香港特別行政區 訴 鄧沅璋
- Parties
- Respondent: 香港特別行政區; Applicant: TANG YUEN CHEUNG (鄧沅璋)
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 4 December 2017
- Case Number
- CACC374/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence / Leave Application Heard by Court of Appeal (criminal Division)
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal against sentence dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Trafficking Dangerous Drugs, Guilty Plea Discount, Sentence Proportionality, Drug Quantity Assessment
- Source Language
- ch
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
香港特別行政區
Respondent
TANG YUEN CHEUNG (鄧沅璋)
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence / Leave Application Heard by Court of Appeal (criminal Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of 14 years 2 months was excessive
- 2 Whether any reduction beyond the one-third guilty plea discount was warranted
- 3 Appropriate sentencing for trafficking 4.96 kg of ketamine
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held the sentence of 14 years 2 months was appropriate; the one-third guilty plea discount had been applied and there were no additional mitigating factors on the record to justify further reduction, so the leave application was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal against sentence dismissed
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal against sentence dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
CACC 374/2016 香港特別行政區 高等法院上訴法庭 刑事司法管轄權 不服刑罰上訴許可申請 刑事上訴案件2016年第374號 (原高等法院刑事案件2016年第156號) __________________ 答辯人 香港特別行政區 與 申請人 TANG YUEN CHEUNG (鄧沅璋) __________________ 主審法官: 高等法院上訴法庭法官潘兆初 高等法院上訴法庭法官彭偉昌 聆訊日期:2017年11月29日 判案日期:2017年11月29日 判案理由書日期:2017年12月4日 判 案 理 由 書 上訴法庭法官彭偉昌頒發上訴庭判案理由書: 2016年7月27日,申請人承認一項‘販運危險藥物’罪,涉及以淨含毒量計4.96公斤氯胺酮。2016年11月28日,他因同一罪名被原審法官(邱智立法官)判處即時入獄14年2個月。申請人不服,就刑期提出上訴申請許可。 本庭在聽畢申請人及答辯方的陳詞後認為,申請人的刑期是合適的;除了認罪後的三分一扣減,卷宗裏並未顯示刑期有進一步下調的理由。 申請人的申請駁回。 (潘兆初) (彭偉昌) 高等法院上訴法庭法官 高等法院上訴法庭法官 答辯人:由律政司檢控官羅天瑋先生代表 申請人:無律師代表,親自應訊