TEAM SUCCESS ENGINEERING LTD v. YAU CHOI LIN AND OTHERS

TEAM SUCCESS ENGINEERING LTD v. YAU CHOI LIN AND OTHERS

Defendants failed to prove exclusive physical control and the requisite animus possidendi for the relevant 12-year period. Their evidence was inconsistent and implausible; aerial photo and expert evidence showed no enclosure or exclusive control and that Oriental King's 2008 works were substantial and not a one-day event. The 1998 tenancy document was excluded for late ambush. Counterclaim for adverse possession dismissed; plaintiff entitled to vacant possession, injunctions and nominal damages.

Citation
[2024] HKDC 2129
Parties
Plaintiff: Team Success Engineering Limited; 1st Defendant: Yau Choi Lin; 2nd Defendant: Yau Shing Yuen; 3rd Defendant: Lau Wai Kit
Court
District Court
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
16 December 2024
Case Number
DCCJ5980/2018
Procedural Posture
Land Dispute Adverse Possession, Trespass and Injunction / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendants' counterclaim for adverse possession dismissed. Plaintiff granted vacant possession and injunctions; nominal damages awarded and costs to plaintiff.
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Mesne Profits, Vacant Possession, Injunction, Late Disclosure and Document Admissibility
Source Language
EN
Property Civil Procedure Limitation Adverse Possession Mesne Profits Vacant Possession Injunction Late Disclosure and Document Admissibility

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Team Success Engineering Limited

Plaintiff

Yau Choi Lin

1st Defendant

Yau Shing Yuen

2nd Defendant

Lau Wai Kit

3rd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land Dispute Adverse Possession, Trespass and Injunction / Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether defendants acquired possessory title by adverse possession over Lot 256 SE and Lot 256 SF
  2. 2 Whether plaintiff's paper title was extinguished under ss 7 and 17 of the Limitation Ordinance (Cap 347)
  3. 3 Whether paving, parking and prior licences/tenancies suffice to show exclusive possession and animus possidendi

Ratio Decidendi

Defendants failed to prove exclusive physical control and the requisite animus possidendi for the relevant 12-year period. Their evidence was inconsistent and implausible; aerial photo and expert evidence showed no enclosure or exclusive control and that Oriental King's 2008 works were substantial and not a one-day event. The 1998 tenancy document was excluded for late ambush. Counterclaim for adverse possession dismissed; plaintiff entitled to vacant possession, injunctions and nominal damages.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendants' counterclaim for adverse possession dismissed. Plaintiff granted vacant possession and injunctions; nominal damages awarded and costs to plaintiff.

Orders

  • Defendants to deliver vacant possession of Lot No 256 S.E. in DD 214 to plaintiff within 14 days from date of order
  • 1st Defendant to deliver vacant possession of Lot No 256 S.F. in DD 214 to plaintiff within 14 days from date of order