PERALTA EUGENIO SARMIENTO v. COMPASS TECHNOLOGY CO LTD AND ANOTHER
The strike out applications were dismissed because the pleaded conspiracy claims were not obviously unsustainable; contested factual issues including whether plaintiffs suffered pecuniary loss and the measure of damages arising from the alleged conspiracy could not be resolved on a strike out application and must proceed to trial despite prior admissions in criminal proceedings and a Labour Tribunal strike out for want of prosecution.
- Citation
- PERALTA EUGENIO SARMIENTO v. COMPASS TECHNOLOGY CO LTD AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff: TEMPRA Virginia Pido; Plaintiff: SEBASTIAN Jonathan San Pedro; Plaintiff: ORDONA Rizalindo Jacildone; Plaintiff: BERTE Narciso Jr. Espejon; Plaintiff: PERALTA Eugenio Sarmiento; Plaintiff: OGDAMIN Roel Mark Franco; Plaintiff: CORNEL Antonio JR. Belandres; Plaintiff: ALGIRE Lester Llanto; 1st Defendant: COMPASS TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LIMITED; 2nd Defendant: WILLIAM M TOLEDO
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 20 August 2009
- Case Number
- DCCJ3502/2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Tort (conspiracy) Relating to Employment and Immigration / Interlocutory Strike Out Application Under O.18 R.19 (application Dismissed)
- Outcome
- Applications to strike out dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Conspiracy, Abuse of Process, Res Judicata, Strike Out Applications, Damages, Exploitation of Migrant Workers
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TEMPRA Virginia Pido
Plaintiff
SEBASTIAN Jonathan San Pedro
Plaintiff
ORDONA Rizalindo Jacildone
Plaintiff
BERTE Narciso Jr. Espejon
Plaintiff
PERALTA Eugenio Sarmiento
Plaintiff
OGDAMIN Roel Mark Franco
Plaintiff
CORNEL Antonio JR. Belandres
Plaintiff
ALGIRE Lester Llanto
Plaintiff
COMPASS TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LIMITED
1st Defendant
WILLIAM M TOLEDO
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Tort (conspiracy) Relating to Employment and Immigration / Interlocutory Strike Out Application Under O.18 R.19 (application Dismissed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conspiracy claims are obviously unsustainable under O.18 r.19
- 2 Whether plaintiffs are precluded by their admissions in criminal proceedings or by issue estoppel from pursuing civil claims
- 3 Whether the Labour Tribunal strike out operates as res judicata
Ratio Decidendi
The strike out applications were dismissed because the pleaded conspiracy claims were not obviously unsustainable; contested factual issues including whether plaintiffs suffered pecuniary loss and the measure of damages arising from the alleged conspiracy could not be resolved on a strike out application and must proceed to trial despite prior admissions in criminal proceedings and a Labour Tribunal strike out for want of prosecution.
Court Disposition
Applications to strike out dismissed
Orders
- Costs of and occasioned by these applications, including reserved costs, to the employees; to be taxed if not agreed with certificate for counsel; employees' own costs subject to legal aid taxation
- Costs not awarded on indemnity basis
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment