STRATECH SYSTEMS LTD v. ATAL TECHNOLOGIES LTD AND ANOTHER
The court held ATAL was entitled to terminate the Sub-Contract because Stratech's continued and explicit threat to use programmable tokens to disable the AVRS constituted illegitimate pressure and repudiatory conduct; AMS and KMS were Custom Programs requiring delivery of source code and Stratech failed to deliver; AVRS was Contractor Supplied Software subject to an irrevocable licence on delivery; ATAL was awarded net damages of HKD 8,720,000 and Stratech's copyright and defamation claims failed for lack of proper pleading and proof.
- Citation
- STRATECH SYSTEMS LTD v. ATAL TECHNOLOGIES LTD AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff (hcct 56/2006); 1st Defendant (hcct 3/2007): ATAL Technologies Limited; Defendant (hcct 56/2006); Plaintiff (hcct 3/2007): Stratech Systems Limited; 2nd Defendant (hcct 3/2007): Poon Lok To Otto
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2011
- Case Number
- HCCT3/2007
- Procedural Posture
- Construction and Arbitration Proceedings (consolidated) / Judgment on Consolidated Trial (court of First Instance)
- Outcome
- Judgment for ATAL. Stratech's claims for copyright infringement and defamation dismissed. ATAL awarded damages against Stratech.
- Legal Topics
- Termination, Economic Duress, Repudiatory Breach, Damages Assessment, Set Off, Source Code and Software Ownership, Licence Vs Assignment, Acceptance of Deliverables, Variation Orders, Maintenance Obligations, Pleading Requirements for Copyright and Defamation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ATAL Technologies Limited
Plaintiff (hcct 56/2006); 1st Defendant (hcct 3/2007)
Stratech Systems Limited
Defendant (hcct 56/2006); Plaintiff (hcct 3/2007)
Poon Lok To Otto
2nd Defendant (hcct 3/2007)
Procedural Posture
Construction and Arbitration Proceedings (consolidated) / Judgment on Consolidated Trial (court of First Instance)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether ATAL was entitled to terminate the Sub-Contract for Stratech's breaches and threats to disable AVRS
- 2 Whether Stratech's programming/use of tokens constituted economic duress or repudiatory conduct
- 3 Whether AMS and KMS were Custom Programs requiring delivery of source code and whether AVRS was Contractor Supplied Software
Ratio Decidendi
The court held ATAL was entitled to terminate the Sub-Contract because Stratech's continued and explicit threat to use programmable tokens to disable the AVRS constituted illegitimate pressure and repudiatory conduct; AMS and KMS were Custom Programs requiring delivery of source code and Stratech failed to deliver; AVRS was Contractor Supplied Software subject to an irrevocable licence on delivery; ATAL was awarded net damages of HKD 8,720,000 and Stratech's copyright and defamation claims failed for lack of proper pleading and proof.
Court Disposition
Judgment for ATAL. Stratech's claims for copyright infringement and defamation dismissed. ATAL awarded damages against Stratech.
Orders
- Judgment for ATAL against Stratech in the net sum of HKD 8,720,000
- Interest on that sum at HSBC prime +1% from 3 August 2006 to date of judgment and thereafter judgment rate
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment