THAI MUOI v. THE HONG KONG HOUSING AUTHORITY AND ANOTHER

THAI MUOI v. THE HONG KONG HOUSING AUTHORITY AND ANOTHER

Section 19(3) of the Housing Ordinance does not clearly oust the court's power of judicial review; HKHA and the Appeal Tribunal committed errors of law by failing to consider whether the tenant took reasonable steps to prevent her husband storing raw opium in the flat and by not addressing the potential application...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
THAI MUOI v. THE HONG KONG HOUSING AUTHORITY AND ANOTHER
Parties
Applicant: Thai Muoi; 1st Respondent: The Hong Kong Housing Authority; 2nd Respondent: Appeal Tribunal (appointed under section 7A(1) of the Housing Ordinance, Cap. 283)
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
30 May 2000
Case Number
HCAL155/1999
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Review / Leave Granted; Final Judgment Quashing Administrative Decisions and Remitting for Reconsideration
Outcome
Decision of Hong Kong Housing Authority issuing Notice to Quit and Appeal Tribunal's confirmation quashed; leave to proceed granted; matter remitted for reconsideration with directions on process; costs order nisi made
Legal Topics
Ouster Clause, Judicial Review, Notice to Quit, Tenancy Agreement Breach, Vicarious Liability, Procedural Fairness, Wednesbury Unreasonableness
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Constitutional Law Housing Law Landlord and Tenant Law Civil Procedure Ouster Clause Judicial Review Notice to Quit +4 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Thai Muoi

Applicant

The Hong Kong Housing Authority

1st Respondent

Appeal Tribunal (appointed under section 7A(1) of the Housing Ordinance, Cap. 283)

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Judicial Review / Leave Granted; Final Judgment Quashing Administrative Decisions and Remitting for Reconsideration

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether section 19(3) of the Housing Ordinance ousts the court's jurisdiction to review HKHA's decision to issue a Notice to Quit
  2. 2 Whether the flat was used for an illegal purpose and whether the tenant permitted such use under clause 2(j)
  3. 3 Whether clause 4(g) (deeming provision) renders the tenant vicariously liable for the husband's actions

Ratio Decidendi

Section 19(3) of the Housing Ordinance does not clearly oust the court's power of judicial review; HKHA and the Appeal Tribunal committed errors of law by failing to consider whether the tenant took reasonable steps to prevent her husband storing raw opium in the flat and by not addressing the potential application of clause 4(g) as a distinct vicarious liability ground; consequently both the Notice to Quit and the Tribunal's confirmation are quashed and the matters must be reconsidered after proper procedure and invitation to respond.

Court Disposition

Decision of Hong Kong Housing Authority issuing Notice to Quit and Appeal Tribunal's confirmation quashed; leave to proceed granted; matter remitted for reconsideration with directions on process; costs order nisi made

Orders

  • Both the decision of the Hong Kong Housing Authority to issue the Notice to Quit and the decision of the Appeal Tribunal confirming the Notice to Quit are quashed
  • Order nisi that Hong Kong Housing Authority and the Appeal Tribunal should bear the Applicant's costs to be taxed if not agreed