DBS BANK (HONG KONG) LTD v. EXCELLENT ACCOUNTING AND SECRETARIAL LTD AND ANOTHER
The Bank proved a prima facie case by producing the signed Guarantee, related loan documents and a handwriting expert report attributing the signatures to D2; D2 failed to provide credible particulars or evidence of forgery, misrepresentation, agency or other vitiating factors and therefore did not raise any triable issue — summary judgment was appropriate and the counterclaim(s) based on those defences must be struck out.
- Citation
- [2023] HKDC 83
- Parties
- Plaintiff: The Bank; 1st Defendant: The Company; 2nd Defendant: D2; 2nd Defendant by Counterclaim: Yim Chun Wai
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 19 January 2023
- Case Number
- DCCJ3085/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Debt/guarantee Enforcement / Order 14 Summary Judgment Application — Decision
- Outcome
- Summary judgment entered for the plaintiff against the 2nd defendant; counterclaim(s) struck out
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Guarantee Enforcement, Non Est Factum, Misrepresentation, Forgery, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Bank
Plaintiff
The Company
1st Defendant
D2
2nd Defendant
Yim Chun Wai
2nd Defendant by Counterclaim
Procedural Posture
Civil Debt/guarantee Enforcement / Order 14 Summary Judgment Application — Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff established a prima facie sustainable case against the 2nd defendant
- 2 Whether the 2nd defendant raised triable issues or a bona fide defence to defeat summary judgment
- 3 Whether the signatures on the Guarantee and loan documents were forged
Ratio Decidendi
The Bank proved a prima facie case by producing the signed Guarantee, related loan documents and a handwriting expert report attributing the signatures to D2; D2 failed to provide credible particulars or evidence of forgery, misrepresentation, agency or other vitiating factors and therefore did not raise any triable issue — summary judgment was appropriate and the counterclaim(s) based on those defences must be struck out.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment entered for the plaintiff against the 2nd defendant; counterclaim(s) struck out
Orders
- Summary judgment for the plaintiff against the 2nd defendant for HK$2,445,692.11
- Interest on HK$1,018,737.24 at 14.375% per annum from 10 June 2019 to date of judgment and thereafter at judgment rate until payment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment