DBS BANK (HONG KONG) LTD v. EXCELLENT ACCOUNTING AND SECRETARIAL LTD AND ANOTHER

DBS BANK (HONG KONG) LTD v. EXCELLENT ACCOUNTING AND SECRETARIAL LTD AND ANOTHER

The Bank proved a prima facie case by producing the signed Guarantee, related loan documents and a handwriting expert report attributing the signatures to D2; D2 failed to provide credible particulars or evidence of forgery, misrepresentation, agency or other vitiating factors and therefore did not raise any triable issue — summary judgment was appropriate and the counterclaim(s) based on those defences must be struck out.

Citation
[2023] HKDC 83
Parties
Plaintiff: The Bank; 1st Defendant: The Company; 2nd Defendant: D2; 2nd Defendant by Counterclaim: Yim Chun Wai
Court
District Court
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
19 January 2023
Case Number
DCCJ3085/2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Debt/guarantee Enforcement / Order 14 Summary Judgment Application — Decision
Outcome
Summary judgment entered for the plaintiff against the 2nd defendant; counterclaim(s) struck out
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Guarantee Enforcement, Non Est Factum, Misrepresentation, Forgery, Burden of Proof
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Bank

Plaintiff

The Company

1st Defendant

D2

2nd Defendant

Yim Chun Wai

2nd Defendant by Counterclaim

Procedural Posture

Civil Debt/guarantee Enforcement / Order 14 Summary Judgment Application — Decision

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff established a prima facie sustainable case against the 2nd defendant
  2. 2 Whether the 2nd defendant raised triable issues or a bona fide defence to defeat summary judgment
  3. 3 Whether the signatures on the Guarantee and loan documents were forged

Ratio Decidendi

The Bank proved a prima facie case by producing the signed Guarantee, related loan documents and a handwriting expert report attributing the signatures to D2; D2 failed to provide credible particulars or evidence of forgery, misrepresentation, agency or other vitiating factors and therefore did not raise any triable issue — summary judgment was appropriate and the counterclaim(s) based on those defences must be struck out.

Court Disposition

Summary judgment entered for the plaintiff against the 2nd defendant; counterclaim(s) struck out

Orders

  • Summary judgment for the plaintiff against the 2nd defendant for HK$2,445,692.11
  • Interest on HK$1,018,737.24 at 14.375% per annum from 10 June 2019 to date of judgment and thereafter at judgment rate until payment