THE QUEEN v. WONG SUEN CHEONG AND ANOTHER
The court held that, while operation of large-scale illegal gambling can merit immediate custody, the magistrate should have considered suspending custodial sentences for offenders who pleaded guilty and had clear or minor records; accordingly the imposed custodial sentences were suspended with conditions and fines in the cases before the court.
- Citation
- THE QUEEN v. WONG SUEN CHEONG AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Respondent: THE QUEEN; 1st Appellant: LAW WING TAK; 2nd Appellant: CHOW YUK LUNG; 3rd Appellant: KUNG HUNG SING; 1st Appellant (ma682/92): WONG SUEN CHEONG; 2nd Appellant (ma682/92): TAM WING KEUNG
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 1992
- Case Number
- HCMA876/1992
- Procedural Posture
- Magistracy Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence (hearing and Judgment)
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed in part; custodial sentences suspended and fines imposed in respect of the appeals heard
- Legal Topics
- Operating Illegal Gambling Establishment, Suspended Sentence, Custodial Sentence, Sentencing Disparity, Plea of Guilty Discount
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
THE QUEEN
Respondent
LAW WING TAK
1st Appellant
CHOW YUK LUNG
2nd Appellant
KUNG HUNG SING
3rd Appellant
WONG SUEN CHEONG
1st Appellant (ma682/92)
TAM WING KEUNG
2nd Appellant (ma682/92)
Procedural Posture
Magistracy Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence (hearing and Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether custodial sentences imposed by the magistrate should be suspended
- 2 Proper weight to give to guilty pleas and minimal previous convictions in sentencing
- 3 Appropriate deterrent for large-scale illegal gambling operators
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that, while operation of large-scale illegal gambling can merit immediate custody, the magistrate should have considered suspending custodial sentences for offenders who pleaded guilty and had clear or minor records; accordingly the imposed custodial sentences were suspended with conditions and fines in the cases before the court.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed in part; custodial sentences suspended and fines imposed in respect of the appeals heard
Orders
- MA682/92: D1 sentenced to 6 months' imprisonment, suspended for 18 months, and fined HKD 10,000
- MA682/92: D2 sentenced to 3 months' imprisonment, suspended for 18 months, and fined HKD 5,000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment