R. v. CHEUNG KIN TAK and Others

R. v. CHEUNG KIN TAK and Others

The magistrate conducted a detailed and careful evaluation of identification and credibility issues, applied the relevant identification principles (Turnbull), and was entitled to prefer prosecution witnesses after observing demeanour; the discrepancies and delay in identification did not render the identifications unsafe and the convictions were therefore upheld.

Citation
R. v. CHEUNG KIN TAK and Others
Parties
Respondent: The Queen; 1st Appellant: Cheung Kin Tak; 2nd Appellant: Tsang Yee Man; 3rd Appellant: Wong Chi Kin; 4th Appellant: Lee Ching Cheung; 5th Appellant: Cheng Wing Keung; 6th Appellant: Ng Shiu Kwan
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
21 April 1995
Case Number
HCMA416/1994
Procedural Posture
Magistracy Criminal Appeal / Appeal Heard and Judgment Delivered (appellate Jurisdiction)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed in full
Legal Topics
Identification Evidence, Assault, Use of Force, Reasonable Force, Credibility and Demeanour, Identification Parade Delay, Safety of Conviction
Source Language
EN
Criminal Law Evidence Police Conduct Appellate Review Identification Evidence Assault Use of Force Reasonable Force +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Queen

Respondent

Cheung Kin Tak

1st Appellant

Tsang Yee Man

2nd Appellant

Wong Chi Kin

3rd Appellant

Lee Ching Cheung

4th Appellant

Cheng Wing Keung

5th Appellant

Ng Shiu Kwan

6th Appellant

Procedural Posture

Magistracy Criminal Appeal / Appeal Heard and Judgment Delivered (appellate Jurisdiction)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether identification evidence was reliable and satisfied Turnbull guidelines
  2. 2 Whether the magistrate misapplied the law on identification or credibility
  3. 3 Whether the evidence supported convictions for common assault and assault occasioning actual bodily harm

Ratio Decidendi

The magistrate conducted a detailed and careful evaluation of identification and credibility issues, applied the relevant identification principles (Turnbull), and was entitled to prefer prosecution witnesses after observing demeanour; the discrepancies and delay in identification did not render the identifications unsafe and the convictions were therefore upheld.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed in full

Orders

  • Appeals against convictions dismissed
  • Sentences upheld