TIME SQUARE LTD v. LEE KWUN KIT t/a JL Music AND ANOTHER
The court held the description of the 2nd defendants was sufficiently certain and that substituted service by fixing documents at a conspicuous place at the Open Piazza, advertisement in one local Chinese and one local English newspaper and posting on the Times Square website (and related measures for subsequent...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] HKCFI 2296
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Times Square Limited; 1st Defendant: LEE KWUN KIT (李冠傑) trading as JL MUSIC; 2nd Defendants: Persons unlawfully occupying or remaining at the Open Piazza of Times Square by busking or any other form of street performance, or persons who cause, place or leave obstructions at the Open Piazza in connection with such performances
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 28 September 2018
- Case Number
- HCA2244/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Inter Partes Summons for Substituted Service and Interlocutory Injunction / First Hearing (interlocutory Application)
- Outcome
- Order for substituted service granted as amended; no injunction granted against the 2nd defendants; application against the 1st defendant adjourned subject to undertaking and directions for further evidence.
- Legal Topics
- Substituted Service, Interim Injunction, Class/unnamed Defendants, Public Obstruction/busking
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Times Square Limited
Plaintiff
LEE KWUN KIT (李冠傑) trading as JL MUSIC
1st Defendant
Persons unlawfully occupying or remaining at the Open Piazza of Times Square by busking or any other form of street performance, or persons who cause, place or leave obstructions at the Open Piazza in connection with such performances
2nd Defendants
Procedural Posture
Inter Partes Summons for Substituted Service and Interlocutory Injunction / First Hearing (interlocutory Application)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an injunction can be directed at a class of unnamed persons described by conduct
- 2 Whether the description of the 2nd defendants is sufficiently certain to identify who is included and excluded
- 3 Whether substituted service is appropriate and adequate given impracticability of personal service on the class
Ratio Decidendi
The court held the description of the 2nd defendants was sufficiently certain and that substituted service by fixing documents at a conspicuous place at the Open Piazza, advertisement in one local Chinese and one local English newspaper and posting on the Times Square website (and related measures for subsequent documents) was appropriate and adequate; accordingly an order for substituted service was granted as amended, but no injunction against the 2nd defendants was granted at this stage.
Court Disposition
Order for substituted service granted as amended; no injunction granted against the 2nd defendants; application against the 1st defendant adjourned subject to undertaking and directions for further evidence.
Orders
- Substituted service of the Writ, the Summons and subsequent documents permitted as amended: (a) fixing the Writ and order at a conspicuous place at the Open Piazza, (b) advertisement in one local Chinese newspaper and one local English newspaper, (c) posting the same advertisements on the Times Square website; and...
- Adjourn application against the 1st defendant on terms that the 1st defendant gives an undertaking not to carry out the acts in (i) and (ii) and that undertaking (iii) be confined to acts in connection with (i) and (ii); directions for filing of further evidence and a date to be fixed for full arguments
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment