TIMES SQUARE LTD v. LEE KWUN KIT (李冠傑) t/a JL MUSIC
Default judgment was appropriate because the 1st Defendant was debarred for non‑compliance and the 2nd Defendant filed no notice of intention to defend; the pleaded facts established that the contested busking and associated activities fell outside the Deed of Dedication's Permitted Purposes, breached express restrictive clauses (noise, obstructions, disturbance) and therefore constituted trespass, justifying permanent injunctions; declaratory relief was refused as unnecessary because the injunctions would achieve the requisite practical protection and a declaration would not serve a useful purpose.
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 438
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Times Square Limited; 1st Defendant: Lee Kwun Kit (李冠傑) trading as JL MUSIC; 2nd Defendant: Persons unlawfully occupying or remaining at the Open Piazza of Times Square by busking or any other form of street performance, or persons who cause, place or leave obstruction(s) at the Open Piazza in connection with the carrying out of such performances
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2020
- Case Number
- HCA2244/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trespass and Injunction (busking Dispute) / Default Judgment Application/decision Under Order 19 R.7
- Outcome
- Permanent injunctions granted against the 1st and 2nd Defendants in respect of busking and related obstructive and disruptive conduct; declaratory relief refused; default judgment entered against the Defendants in part.
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment Under Order 19 R.7, Deed of Dedication, Declaratory Relief, Busking/street Performance, Substituted Service
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Times Square Limited
Plaintiff
Lee Kwun Kit (李冠傑) trading as JL MUSIC
1st Defendant
Persons unlawfully occupying or remaining at the Open Piazza of Times Square by busking or any other form of street performance, or persons who cause, place or leave obstruction(s) at the Open Piazza in connection with the carrying out of such performances
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trespass and Injunction (busking Dispute) / Default Judgment Application/decision Under Order 19 R.7
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether default judgment should be entered against the 1st and 2nd Defendants under Order 19 r.7
- 2 Whether permanent injunctive relief is appropriate to restrain busking and related conduct at the Open Piazza
- 3 Whether busking or street performance falls within the 'passive recreation' Permitted Purposes in the Deed of Dedication
Ratio Decidendi
Default judgment was appropriate because the 1st Defendant was debarred for non‑compliance and the 2nd Defendant filed no notice of intention to defend; the pleaded facts established that the contested busking and associated activities fell outside the Deed of Dedication's Permitted Purposes, breached express restrictive clauses (noise, obstructions, disturbance) and therefore constituted trespass, justifying permanent injunctions; declaratory relief was refused as unnecessary because the injunctions would achieve the requisite practical protection and a declaration would not serve a useful purpose.
Court Disposition
Permanent injunctions granted against the 1st and 2nd Defendants in respect of busking and related obstructive and disruptive conduct; declaratory relief refused; default judgment entered against the Defendants in part.
Orders
- Permanent injunction restraining the 1st and 2nd Defendants from occupying or remaining at the Open Piazza of Times Square by busking or any other form of street performance
- Permanent injunction restraining the 1st and 2nd Defendants from causing, placing or leaving obstructions at the Open Piazza in connection with the carrying out of busking or any other form of street performance
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment