TRAN VAN HIEU v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD / NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE [Decision on Leave Application]

TRAN VAN HIEU v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD / NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE [Decision on Leave Application]

Because the applicant elected to withdraw the leave application and there was nothing outstanding in the action, the court applied the Re Manik precedent and dismissed the application rather than leaving the action at large.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] HKCFI 1266
Parties
Applicant: Tran Van Hieu; Putative Respondent: Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office; Putative Interested Party: Director of Immigration
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
21 May 2024
Case Number
HCAL309/2021
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review / Decision on Leave Application (dismissed)
Outcome
Leave to apply for judicial review dismissed.
Legal Topics
Non Refoulement Claim, Leave to Apply for Judicial Review, Judicial Review, Appeal to Torture Claims Appeal Board, Withdrawal of Application, Dismissal on Withdrawal
Source Language
en
Constitutional and Administrative Law Immigration Law Human Rights Asylum and Non Refoulement Non Refoulement Claim Leave to Apply for Judicial Review Judicial Review Appeal to Torture Claims Appeal Board +2 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tran Van Hieu

Applicant

Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office

Putative Respondent

Director of Immigration

Putative Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review / Decision on Leave Application (dismissed)

  1. 1 Whether leave to apply for judicial review should be granted to challenge the Board's decision rejecting a non-refoulement claim
  2. 2 Whether the court should dismiss the leave application after the applicant sought to withdraw and there was nothing outstanding
  3. 3 Application of precedent on dismissal where applicant withdraws

Ratio Decidendi

Because the applicant elected to withdraw the leave application and there was nothing outstanding in the action, the court applied the Re Manik precedent and dismissed the application rather than leaving the action at large.

Court Disposition

Leave to apply for judicial review dismissed.

Orders

  • Leave to apply for Judicial Review be dismissed.