DARACH E. HAUGHEY AND ANOTHER v. LAM WAI PING STELLA AND OTHERS
The court found on the balance of probabilities that the bankrupt deliberately transferred funds to the 1st respondent and caused acquisition through Irving with the intention of placing assets beyond his creditors; those transfers (HK$3,583,600 and HK$7,470,600 applied to Park Place, and US$2,000,000 to Grainger) were gifts/transactions at an undervalue under s 49 and are void against the Trustees, entitling Trustees to repayment and to the net sale proceeds of Park Place.
- Citation
- DARACH E. HAUGHEY AND ANOTHER v. LAM WAI PING STELLA AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Applicants (joint and Several Trustees): Darrach E. Haughey and Lai Kar Yan (Derek); Bankrupt: William Henry Woo; 1st Respondent: Lam Wai Ping Stella also known as Stella Woo; 2nd Respondent: Irving Developments Limited; 3rd Respondent: Grainger Resources Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 2005
- Case Number
- HCB276/2002
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy (court of First Instance) / Judgment (11 May 2005)
- Outcome
- Declarations made that specified payments were transactions at an undervalue and void as against the Trustees; orders for repayment and payment of sale proceeds; costs ordered nisi.
- Legal Topics
- Transaction at an Undervalue, Presumption of Advancement, Voidable Transactions, Recovery of Proceeds, Mareva Injunction
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Darrach E. Haughey and Lai Kar Yan (Derek)
Applicants (joint and Several Trustees)
William Henry Woo
Bankrupt
Lam Wai Ping Stella also known as Stella Woo
1st Respondent
Irving Developments Limited
2nd Respondent
Grainger Resources Limited
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy (court of First Instance) / Judgment (11 May 2005)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the payments from the bankrupt to the 1st respondent and to Grainger constituted transactions at an undervalue under s 49 Bankruptcy Ordinance
- 2 Whether funds in the 1st respondent's account were gifts or held on trust for the bankrupt
- 3 Whether the recipients (1st respondent, Irving, Grainger) are liable to repay sums or hand over proceeds
Ratio Decidendi
The court found on the balance of probabilities that the bankrupt deliberately transferred funds to the 1st respondent and caused acquisition through Irving with the intention of placing assets beyond his creditors; those transfers (HK$3,583,600 and HK$7,470,600 applied to Park Place, and US$2,000,000 to Grainger) were gifts/transactions at an undervalue under s 49 and are void against the Trustees, entitling Trustees to repayment and to the net sale proceeds of Park Place.
Court Disposition
Declarations made that specified payments were transactions at an undervalue and void as against the Trustees; orders for repayment and payment of sale proceeds; costs ordered nisi.
Orders
- Declaration that HK$3,583,600 received by the 1st Respondent on 8 February 2000 and applied to Park Place was a transaction at an undervalue under s 49 and void against the Trustees
- Declaration that HK$7,470,600 received by the 1st Respondent as part of US$4,000,000 on 15 February 2000 and applied to Park Place was a transaction at an undervalue under s 49 and void against the Trustees
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment