CHAN CHI WAI also known as CHAN SAU PING AND ANOTHER v. CHAN SAU WAH AND OTHERS
For the purposes of sections 36(b) and 37(4) DCO 'the land' refers to the entire registered property (the whole building) where the interest claimed is a fractional undivided share; the annual value of the whole building (HK$315,000) exceeds the District Court's jurisdictional limit (HK$240,000), so the counterclaim is outside District Court jurisdiction and the whole proceedings are transferred to the Court of First Instance.
- Citation
- CHAN CHI WAI also known as CHAN SAU PING AND ANOTHER v. CHAN SAU WAH AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: CHAN CHI WAI aka CHAN SAU PING; 2nd Plaintiff: CHAN SAU WO aka CHAN SAU WOO; 1st Defendant: CHAN SAU WAH; 2nd Defendant: DAI WAIFEN; 3rd Defendant: CHAN SAU HING
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 3 August 2016
- Case Number
- DCCJ1503/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (possession and Equitable Counterclaim Concerning Land and Trust) / Application to Transfer Proceedings to Court of First Instance Under Section 41(3) District Court Ordinance
- Outcome
- The whole proceedings are transferred to the Court of First Instance; costs to follow the event in favour of the defendants; order nisi for costs to defendants with certificate for counsel, to be taxed if not agreed.
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Proceedings, Jurisdictional Monetary Limit, District Court Jurisdiction, Constructive Trust, Tenancy in Common, Possession, Mesne Profits
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHAN CHI WAI aka CHAN SAU PING
1st Plaintiff
CHAN SAU WO aka CHAN SAU WOO
2nd Plaintiff
CHAN SAU WAH
1st Defendant
DAI WAIFEN
2nd Defendant
CHAN SAU HING
3rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (possession and Equitable Counterclaim Concerning Land and Trust) / Application to Transfer Proceedings to Court of First Instance Under Section 41(3) District Court Ordinance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether 'the land' in sections 36(b) and 37(4) District Court Ordinance refers to the whole building or only the disputed fractional interest
- 2 Whether the counterclaim for a 2/5 equitable interest in the building exceeds the District Court's monetary jurisdiction
- 3 Whether the whole proceedings should be transferred to the Court of First Instance under s41(3) DCO
Ratio Decidendi
For the purposes of sections 36(b) and 37(4) DCO 'the land' refers to the entire registered property (the whole building) where the interest claimed is a fractional undivided share; the annual value of the whole building (HK$315,000) exceeds the District Court's jurisdictional limit (HK$240,000), so the counterclaim is outside District Court jurisdiction and the whole proceedings are transferred to the Court of First Instance.
Court Disposition
The whole proceedings are transferred to the Court of First Instance; costs to follow the event in favour of the defendants; order nisi for costs to defendants with certificate for counsel, to be taxed if not agreed.
Orders
- Whole proceedings transferred to the Court of First Instance pursuant to section 41(3) District Court Ordinance
- Costs of the application to be paid to the defendants with certificate for counsel, to be taxed if not agreed (order nisi)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment