SHELL HONG KONG LTD v. MEYER ALUMINIUM LTD
Because the defendant asserted a common defence of collusion in breach of the First Conduct Rule under the Competition Ordinance, the court granted transfer of the competition allegation to the Competition Tribunal and ordered that the High Court actions be listed and managed together with the Tribunal proceedings; general discovery was dispensed with and discovery was confined to directly relevant documents and those referred to in the pleadings, with High Court pleadings to incorporate Tribunal pleadings on competition issues.
- Citation
- [2018] HKCFI 2095
- Parties
- Plaintiff (hca 1929/2017; Cta1/2018): Taching Petroleum Company, Limited; Plaintiff (hca 1069/2018); Intended Intervener (cta1/2018): Shell Hong Kong Limited; Defendant (all Cases): Meyer Aluminium Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 12 September 2018
- Case Number
- HCA1069/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (competition/antitrust) / Directions Hearing/case Management (pleadings and Discovery Stage)
- Outcome
- Leave granted to transfer the competition allegation to the Competition Tribunal; High Court actions to be listed and heard together with Tribunal proceedings for case management; general discovery dispensed; discovery confined to directly relevant documents and documents referred to in the pleadings; High Court...
- Legal Topics
- Transfer to Competition Tribunal, Consolidation/listing for Case Management, Discovery (direct Relevance), Pleadings Incorporation, First Conduct Rule (price Fixing)
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Taching Petroleum Company, Limited
Plaintiff (hca 1929/2017; Cta1/2018)
Shell Hong Kong Limited
Plaintiff (hca 1069/2018); Intended Intervener (cta1/2018)
Meyer Aluminium Limited
Defendant (all Cases)
Procedural Posture
Civil (competition/antitrust) / Directions Hearing/case Management (pleadings and Discovery Stage)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the allegation of collusion/price fixing under the First Conduct Rule should be transferred to the Competition Tribunal
- 2 Whether the High Court actions should be consolidated or listed to be heard with Tribunal proceedings for case management
- 3 Scope of discovery and whether general discovery should be dispensed with
Ratio Decidendi
Because the defendant asserted a common defence of collusion in breach of the First Conduct Rule under the Competition Ordinance, the court granted transfer of the competition allegation to the Competition Tribunal and ordered that the High Court actions be listed and managed together with the Tribunal proceedings; general discovery was dispensed with and discovery was confined to directly relevant documents and those referred to in the pleadings, with High Court pleadings to incorporate Tribunal pleadings on competition issues.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to transfer the competition allegation to the Competition Tribunal; High Court actions to be listed and heard together with Tribunal proceedings for case management; general discovery dispensed; discovery confined to directly relevant documents and documents referred to in the pleadings; High Court...
Orders
- Transfer the Allegation in the Shell Action to the Competition Tribunal.
- List and hear the balance of the High Court Actions together with the two sets of proceedings in the Competition Tribunal for case management until further order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment