韓欣陶 對 GWYNN HOPKINS及另一人

韓欣陶 對 GWYNN HOPKINS及另一人

申請未能證明受託人已違反法例或犯下顯然錯誤:受託人已招致之費用尚未經法庭評定,故不可即時禁止其從破產產業收取款項;關於保證金,無證據顯示此款非屬破產產業或受托人有違法處理,且申請人之子未按s43D向受託人提出摒除申請;受託人拒絕繼續上訴基於案件歷史、勝算及訟費評估,申請人未能推翻該決定。基於此,法院撤銷傳票並拒絕申請人之請求。

Citation
[2023] HKCFI 2879
Parties
Applicant (bankrupt): 韓欣陶; Respondent (joint and Several Trustee): GWYNN HOPKINS; Respondent (joint and Several Trustee): 劉穎儀
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
9 November 2023
Case Number
HCB164/2020
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application Under Bankruptcy Ordinance / Hearing on Summons Under S43 D and S84 (interlocutory Hearing)
Outcome
summons dismissed
Legal Topics
Trustee Remuneration, Assets of Bankrupt Estate, Exclusion of Assets From Estate, Right to Continue Litigation, Court Supervision of Trustees
Source Language
CH

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

韓欣陶

Applicant (bankrupt)

GWYNN HOPKINS

Respondent (joint and Several Trustee)

劉穎儀

Respondent (joint and Several Trustee)

Procedural Posture

Bankruptcy Application Under Bankruptcy Ordinance / Hearing on Summons Under S43 D and S84 (interlocutory Hearing)

  1. 1 Whether the trustees should be prohibited from recovering their costs from the bankrupt estate
  2. 2 Whether the guarantee deposit of HK$383,378.26 should be excluded from the bankrupt estate
  3. 3 Whether the trustees' refusal to continue appeals can be overturned under s43D

Ratio Decidendi

申請未能證明受託人已違反法例或犯下顯然錯誤:受託人已招致之費用尚未經法庭評定,故不可即時禁止其從破產產業收取款項;關於保證金,無證據顯示此款非屬破產產業或受托人有違法處理,且申請人之子未按s43D向受託人提出摒除申請;受託人拒絕繼續上訴基於案件歷史、勝算及訟費評估,申請人未能推翻該決定。基於此,法院撤銷傳票並拒絕申請人之請求。

Court Disposition

summons dismissed

Orders

  • 申請人須支付受託人就該傳票產生之訟費
  • 批出由大律師處理訟費證書