TSANG HING CHEUNG v. CHAN PO LING STELLA AND OTHERS
Engaging an apparently competent independent contractor for window replacement did not impose a non-delegable duty on the occupiers because the work was not inherently extra-hazardous nor was it work upon or projecting over a highway; 2nd defendant was not an occupier; the 4th defendant (worker) was negligent and the 3rd defendant had judgment in default, but the plaintiff's assessed damages were entirely offset by employees' compensation received, so no net award to plaintiff and actions against 1st and 2nd and against 4th were dismissed.
- Citation
- TSANG HING CHEUNG v. CHAN PO LING STELLA AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Tsang Hing Cheung; 1st Defendant (occupier/owner): Chan Po Ling Stella; 2nd Defendant (co Owner): Tsui Yun Ho Pat; 3rd Defendant (contractor): Wai Fat Aluminium Engineering Limited; 4th Defendant (employee of 3rd Defendant): Au Chi Hung
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2002
- Case Number
- HCPI869/2001
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injuries Action / Judgment Delivered (liability and Quantum)
- Outcome
- Judgment for defendants in respect of 1st and 2nd; no net judgment for plaintiff against 3rd and 4th after set-off; 4th defendant found liable in fact but plaintiff's claim dismissed by effect of employees' compensation set-off; default judgment previously entered against 3rd defendant for liability with damages to...
- Legal Topics
- Independent Contractor Liability, Non Delegable Duty, Extra Hazardous Operations, Work on or Near Highway, Damages Assessment, Set Off for Employees' Compensation, Conveyancing Formalities
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tsang Hing Cheung
Plaintiff
Chan Po Ling Stella
1st Defendant (occupier/owner)
Tsui Yun Ho Pat
2nd Defendant (co Owner)
Wai Fat Aluminium Engineering Limited
3rd Defendant (contractor)
Au Chi Hung
4th Defendant (employee of 3rd Defendant)
Procedural Posture
Personal Injuries Action / Judgment Delivered (liability and Quantum)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether occupiers (1st and 2nd defendants) owed a non-delegable duty for contractor's negligence
- 2 Whether the window replacement was an extra-hazardous operation or work on/over a highway
- 3 Whether the 2nd defendant held beneficial/occupier status at time of accident
Ratio Decidendi
Engaging an apparently competent independent contractor for window replacement did not impose a non-delegable duty on the occupiers because the work was not inherently extra-hazardous nor was it work upon or projecting over a highway; 2nd defendant was not an occupier; the 4th defendant (worker) was negligent and the 3rd defendant had judgment in default, but the plaintiff's assessed damages were entirely offset by employees' compensation received, so no net award to plaintiff and actions against 1st and 2nd and against 4th were dismissed.
Court Disposition
Judgment for defendants in respect of 1st and 2nd; no net judgment for plaintiff against 3rd and 4th after set-off; 4th defendant found liable in fact but plaintiff's claim dismissed by effect of employees' compensation set-off; default judgment previously entered against 3rd defendant for liability with damages to...
Orders
- Plaintiff's action against the 1st and 2nd defendants dismissed
- Plaintiff's action against the 4th defendant dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment