UBS AG v. STAND FORD INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISES LTD. AND OTHERS
The court held that recoveries totaling US$1,399,446.10 must be deducted from the plaintiff's claimed principal of US$1,958,622.66 leaving a principal due of US$559,176.56; recovered sums should be appropriated to outstanding principal (not to accrued interest) to avoid compounding; interest is to be simple and computed at the UBS US dollar borrowing rate on the principal sum from time to time outstanding to the date of judgment and thereafter at the judgment rate; compound interest is refused; costs payable by the 3rd defendant include taxed costs of proceedings against the 2nd and 4th defendants and Stand Ford and are to be assessed on a common fund basis; plaintiff to prepare draft...
- Citation
- UBS AG v. STAND FORD INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISES LTD. AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff: UBS AG; 1st Defendant: STAND FORD INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED; 2nd Defendant: ING PETR VYPLEL; 3rd Defendant: WONG CHEE KING; 4th Defendant: MIROSLAV KRIZ
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 6 August 2002
- Case Number
- HCCL45/2000
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Action (knowing Assistance / Constructive Trust) / Judgment on Quantum, Interest and Costs Following Liability Finding
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff against the 3rd defendant for US$559,176.56 plus interest; interest to be simple at the UBS US dollar borrowing rate on principal outstanding to date of judgment and thereafter at the judgment rate; compound interest refused; costs payable by the 3rd defendant to be taxed on a common fund...
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Trust, Knowing Assistance, Set Off and Recovery, Interest (pre Judgment and Post Judgment), Appropriation of Payments, Costs (common Fund Vs Indemnity Vs Party and Party), Settlement Agreements
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
UBS AG
Plaintiff
STAND FORD INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED
1st Defendant
ING PETR VYPLEL
2nd Defendant
WONG CHEE KING
3rd Defendant
MIROSLAV KRIZ
4th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Action (knowing Assistance / Constructive Trust) / Judgment on Quantum, Interest and Costs Following Liability Finding
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether recoveries by the plaintiff from other parties reduce the damages payable by the 3rd defendant and to what extent
- 2 Whether the costs element included in a global settlement should be attributed to the plaintiff's recovery for set-off against the 3rd defendant
- 3 Appropriate method of appropriation of recovered sums (towards interest first or principal first)
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that recoveries totaling US$1,399,446.10 must be deducted from the plaintiff's claimed principal of US$1,958,622.66 leaving a principal due of US$559,176.56; recovered sums should be appropriated to outstanding principal (not to accrued interest) to avoid compounding; interest is to be simple and computed at the UBS US dollar borrowing rate on the principal sum from time to time outstanding to the date of judgment and thereafter at the judgment rate; compound interest is refused; costs payable by the 3rd defendant include taxed costs of proceedings against the 2nd and 4th defendants and Stand Ford and are to be assessed on a common fund basis; plaintiff to prepare draft...
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff against the 3rd defendant for US$559,176.56 plus interest; interest to be simple at the UBS US dollar borrowing rate on principal outstanding to date of judgment and thereafter at the judgment rate; compound interest refused; costs payable by the 3rd defendant to be taxed on a common fund...
Orders
- Principal sum due by 3rd defendant: US$559,176.56
- Recovered sums totaling US$1,399,446.10 to be set off against plaintiff's claim prior to interest calculation
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment