UNION BEST ENGINEERING LTD v. CHING NGAR ENGINEERING LTD AND ANOTHER
The judge accepted the Plaintiff's account that the 2nd Defendant requested and received a cash cheque and, under pressure and after telephone consultation with his partner, orally guaranteed that the 1st Defendant would perform the termination agreement; contemporaneous alteration of the agreement's signature page...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- UNION BEST ENGINEERING LTD v. CHING NGAR ENGINEERING LTD AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Union Best Engineering Limited; 1st Defendant: Ching Ngar Engineering Limited; 2nd Defendant: Chu Wai Wing
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 2004
- Case Number
- DCCJ6376/2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Breach of Contract (termination Agreement), Claim for Damages and Indemnity / Judgment After Trial (district Court)
- Outcome
- Finding for Plaintiff on existence of an oral personal guarantee by the 2nd Defendant that the 1st Defendant would perform the termination agreement; declaration that 1st and 2nd Defendants are liable to indemnify Plaintiff for the Labour Tribunal award of HK$556,770 upon proof of payment; costs to Plaintiff nisi to...
- Legal Topics
- Termination Agreement, Oral Guarantee, Personal Guarantor Liability, Liability for Unpaid Wages, Indemnity Upon Payment, Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Union Best Engineering Limited
Plaintiff
Ching Ngar Engineering Limited
1st Defendant
Chu Wai Wing
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Breach of Contract (termination Agreement), Claim for Damages and Indemnity / Judgment After Trial (district Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2nd Defendant gave an oral guarantee that the 1st Defendant would comply with the termination agreement
- 2 Whether the 2nd Defendant was a party to the written termination agreement
- 3 Whether the 2nd Defendant was personally liable even if not a contracting party
Ratio Decidendi
The judge accepted the Plaintiff's account that the 2nd Defendant requested and received a cash cheque and, under pressure and after telephone consultation with his partner, orally guaranteed that the 1st Defendant would perform the termination agreement; contemporaneous alteration of the agreement's signature page and surrounding conduct supported inferring an oral guarantee; accordingly the 2nd Defendant is bound as guarantor and the court granted a conditional indemnity declaration for the Labour Tribunal award upon proof of payment and an order nisi for costs.
Court Disposition
Finding for Plaintiff on existence of an oral personal guarantee by the 2nd Defendant that the 1st Defendant would perform the termination agreement; declaration that 1st and 2nd Defendants are liable to indemnify Plaintiff for the Labour Tribunal award of HK$556,770 upon proof of payment; costs to Plaintiff nisi to...
Orders
- Declaration that the 1st and 2nd Defendants are liable to indemnify the Plaintiff in the sum of HK$556,770 payable under LBTC10033/2003 upon proof that such payment has been made by the Plaintiff
- Order nisi that the 1st and 2nd Defendants pay the Plaintiff's costs of the action to be taxed if not agreed with Certificate for Counsel
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment