LI MING AND OTHERS v. ZHANG CAIKUI AND ANOTHER
The record is unreadable and cannot serve as a reliable basis for substantive adjudication; the court will not determine merits absent a legible, authenticated filing and therefore refuses to proceed on the present document.
- Citation
- [2018] HKCFI 1042
- Parties
- Applicant: Unknown Applicant; Respondent: Unknown Respondent
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 7 May 2018
- Case Number
- HCA1282/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Unreadable / Indeterminate Document / Administrative Review / Pre Hearing
- Outcome
- Administrative closure / return for refiling due to unreadable record
- Legal Topics
- Document Authenticity, Admissibility, Case Management
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Unknown Applicant
Applicant
Unknown Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Unreadable / Indeterminate Document / Administrative Review / Pre Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the provided record constitutes a legible legal judgment
- 2 Admissibility and authenticity of the submission
- 3 Appropriate procedural response to an unreadable filing
Ratio Decidendi
The record is unreadable and cannot serve as a reliable basis for substantive adjudication; the court will not determine merits absent a legible, authenticated filing and therefore refuses to proceed on the present document.
Court Disposition
Administrative closure / return for refiling due to unreadable record
Orders
- The submitted document is rejected as an operative record and the matter is administratively closed pending refiling.
- Registry is ordered to return the submission to the filer with instructions to refile a legible, authenticated copy within the statutory time if the party wishes to proceed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment