KAO, LEE & YIP (a firm) v. DONALD KOO HOI-YAN
The court ordered that Mrs Lam remain as a co-plaintiff but must be indemnified by Mr Kao and Mr Yip for both past and future liabilities for the plaintiff's and defendants' costs (past indemnity founded on implied contractual indemnity on retirement; future indemnity under court's jurisdiction) and that security of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- KAO, LEE & YIP (a firm) v. DONALD KOO HOI-YAN
- Parties
- Plaintiff (firm): KAO, LEE & YIP (a firm); Plaintiff (partner): Emmanuel Chu Chee Kao; Plaintiff (partner): Yip Wan Tak; Plaintiff (retired Partner / Applicant): Alexa Cheung Lam; Defendant (1st): Donald Koo Hoi-Yan; Defendant (2nd): Edwin Lau Yi-Ho; Defendant (3rd): Mohan Datwani; Defendant (4th): Vivian Fan Cho-Man; Defendant (5th): Monica Cheung Yun Kwan; Defendant (6th): Lee Suk Yee (also known as Lisa Lee)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 22 February 2002
- Case Number
- HCA8847/1993
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Partnership Dispute (breach of Fiduciary Duty, Contract and Partnership Deed) / Interlocutory Summons for Indemnity, Security and Striking Out Heard 22 February 2002; Reasons Handed Down 8 March 2002
- Outcome
- Summons granted in part: indemnities ordered for past and future costs; security ordered; specific costs allocation made.
- Legal Topics
- Unwilling Plaintiff, Indemnity for Costs, Security for Indemnity, Striking Out, Joinder
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
KAO, LEE & YIP (a firm)
Plaintiff (firm)
Emmanuel Chu Chee Kao
Plaintiff (partner)
Yip Wan Tak
Plaintiff (partner)
Alexa Cheung Lam
Plaintiff (retired Partner / Applicant)
Donald Koo Hoi-Yan
Defendant (1st)
Edwin Lau Yi-Ho
Defendant (2nd)
Mohan Datwani
Defendant (3rd)
Vivian Fan Cho-Man
Defendant (4th)
Monica Cheung Yun Kwan
Defendant (5th)
Lee Suk Yee (also known as Lisa Lee)
Defendant (6th)
Procedural Posture
Civil Partnership Dispute (breach of Fiduciary Duty, Contract and Partnership Deed) / Interlocutory Summons for Indemnity, Security and Striking Out Heard 22 February 2002; Reasons Handed Down 8 March 2002
Legal Issues
- 1 What orders are open where a partner who is a party to litigation no longer wishes to continue?
- 2 Whether the retired partner should be struck out as a plaintiff
- 3 Whether the retired partner should be joined as a defendant
Ratio Decidendi
The court ordered that Mrs Lam remain as a co-plaintiff but must be indemnified by Mr Kao and Mr Yip for both past and future liabilities for the plaintiff's and defendants' costs (past indemnity founded on implied contractual indemnity on retirement; future indemnity under court's jurisdiction) and that security of HK$4,500,000 be provided within 14 days to secure potential liability for the defendants' future costs; costs of the application were allocated as specified.
Court Disposition
Summons granted in part: indemnities ordered for past and future costs; security ordered; specific costs allocation made.
Orders
- Mr Emmanuel Chu Chee Kao and Mr Yip Wan Tak do indemnify and keep indemnified Mrs Lam Cheung Alexa from and against all and any liability which she will hereinafter incur in respect of the Plaintiff's own costs and the Defendants' costs in this action.
- Mr Emmanuel Chu Chee Kao and Mr Yip Wan Tak do indemnify and keep indemnified Mrs Lam Cheung Alexa from and against all and any liability which she has to date incurred in respect of the Plaintiff's own costs and the Defendants' costs in this action.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment