LEUNG YUK LAN SUING BY THE OFFICIAL SOLICITOR, HER NEXT FRIEND v. LIANG CHENG RU AND ANOTHER
Service was proved, defendants defaulted, and the pleaded facts established unlawful possession of the property and misappropriation of funds by the 1st defendant; accordingly judgment for the plaintiff was entered ordering delivery of vacant possession, an injunction, mesne profits at HKD13,000 per month from 10 February 2014, return of HKD471,000 and CNY5,000 with pre‑ and post‑judgment interest, delivery up of personal belongings and costs.
- Citation
- [2019] HKDC 228
- Parties
- Plaintiff (sued by the Official Solicitor as Next Friend): Leung Yuk Lan (梁玉蘭); 1st Defendant: Liang Cheng Ru (梁成汝); 2nd Defendant: All person(s) in occupation of the Property known as Flat No 16 (Formerly Flat No 1516), 15/F, Wai Lee Building, 997 King's Road, Hong Kong
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2019
- Case Number
- DCCJ3868/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action Possession, Mesne Profits and Restitution / Default Judgment (decision)
- Outcome
- Judgment entered for the plaintiff against both defendants ordering vacant possession, injunctions, mesne profits, delivery up of personal property, return of misappropriated funds with interest and costs.
- Legal Topics
- Vacant Possession, Mesne Profits, Constructive Trust, Fiduciary Duty, Guardianship Order, Delivery Up of Personal Property, Injunction, Assessment of Damages, Interest on Judgment, Service of Process
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leung Yuk Lan (梁玉蘭)
Plaintiff (sued by the Official Solicitor as Next Friend)
Liang Cheng Ru (梁成汝)
1st Defendant
All person(s) in occupation of the Property known as Flat No 16 (Formerly Flat No 1516), 15/F, Wai Lee Building, 997 King's Road, Hong Kong
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Action Possession, Mesne Profits and Restitution / Default Judgment (decision)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether service was valid
- 2 Whether default judgment could be entered on pleaded facts only
- 3 Whether the defendants were entitled to remain in possession of the Property
Ratio Decidendi
Service was proved, defendants defaulted, and the pleaded facts established unlawful possession of the property and misappropriation of funds by the 1st defendant; accordingly judgment for the plaintiff was entered ordering delivery of vacant possession, an injunction, mesne profits at HKD13,000 per month from 10 February 2014, return of HKD471,000 and CNY5,000 with pre‑ and post‑judgment interest, delivery up of personal belongings and costs.
Court Disposition
Judgment entered for the plaintiff against both defendants ordering vacant possession, injunctions, mesne profits, delivery up of personal property, return of misappropriated funds with interest and costs.
Orders
- The defendants do forthwith deliver vacant possession of the Property to the plaintiff.
- A declaration that each of the defendants is not entitled to enter the Property.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment