CHOW TING v. TENG YU YAN ANNE (THE RETURNING OFFICER FOR THE HONG KONG ISLAND CONSTITUENCY) AND ANOTHER
The court held that s40(1)(b)(i) requires an objective, substantive intention to uphold the Basic Law and pledge allegiance; the Returning Officer was required to give the petitioner a reasonable opportunity to respond to adverse materials before invalidating the nomination; the failure to afford that opportunity was a material irregularity; accordingly the Election Petition was allowed and the declared result set aside (Au Nok Hin was not duly elected).
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 2135
- Parties
- Petitioner: Chow Ting; 1st Respondent: Teng Yu-Yan Anne (The Returning Officer for the Hong Kong Island Constituency); 2nd Respondent: Au Nok-hin
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 2 September 2019
- Case Number
- HCAL804/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Election Petition / Judgment (court of First Instance)
- Outcome
- Election Petition allowed; Au Nok Hin not duly elected; no other candidate declared elected in his place.
- Legal Topics
- Validity of Nomination, Declaration to Uphold Basic Law, Natural Justice, Returning Officer Powers, NPCSC Interpretation, Election Irregularity
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chow Ting
Petitioner
Teng Yu-Yan Anne (The Returning Officer for the Hong Kong Island Constituency)
1st Respondent
Au Nok-hin
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Election Petition / Judgment (court of First Instance)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether signing the statutory declaration is a formal or substantive requirement under s40(1)(b)(i) of the Legislative Council Ordinance
- 2 Whether the Returning Officer must give a nominee a reasonable opportunity to respond to materials relied upon in invalidating a nomination
- 3 Whether failure to afford a hearing amounted to a material irregularity in the by-election
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that s40(1)(b)(i) requires an objective, substantive intention to uphold the Basic Law and pledge allegiance; the Returning Officer was required to give the petitioner a reasonable opportunity to respond to adverse materials before invalidating the nomination; the failure to afford that opportunity was a material irregularity; accordingly the Election Petition was allowed and the declared result set aside (Au Nok Hin was not duly elected).
Court Disposition
Election Petition allowed; Au Nok Hin not duly elected; no other candidate declared elected in his place.
Orders
- Declare that Au Nok Hin was not duly elected as member for the Hong Kong Island Geographical Constituency
- Declare that neither the Petitioner nor any of the other candidates was duly elected in his place
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment