WAH SUNG CONSTRUCTION & PILING LTD v. CHEERWIDE LTD
The Varied Contractor Agreement produced by Wah Sung/Alliance (including the Excepted List and Initial Approved Plans) was the true contract; it was not void for uncertainty. Many Additional Works were outside the VCA and authorised by Alliance and/or ratified or acquiesced in by Cheerwide (actual and ostensible authority), so Wah Sung was entitled to payment for agreed additional works (HK$34,300,469.25) and quantum meruit items (HK$730,533.70) together with levies, administrative fee, HD payments and delay losses. Cheerwide’s counterclaims against Wah Sung, Alliance and Chiu failed; Chiu owed no personal tortious duty. The judge applied objective contractual construction principles, the...
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 45
- Parties
- Plaintiff (by Original Action); 1st Defendant (by Counterclaim): Wah Sung Construction & Piling Limited; Defendant (by Original Action); Plaintiff (by Counterclaim): Cheerwide Limited; 2nd Defendant (by Counterclaim): Alliance Architects Limited; 3rd Defendant (by Counterclaim): Chiu Sung Kin
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 10 January 2024
- Case Number
- HCCT57/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Construction and Arbitration Proceedings / Trial (judgment Delivered 10 January 2024)
- Outcome
- Judgment entered for Wah Sung; Cheerwide’s counterclaims against Wah Sung, Alliance and Chiu dismissed; final sum awarded to Wah Sung HKD22,974,308.29; Chiu not liable personally.
- Legal Topics
- Variation Orders, Lump Sum Contract Construction, Time at Large/prevention Principle, Assumption of Responsibility, Final Account and Certification, Liquidated Damages, Retention Money, Costs and Interest
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wah Sung Construction & Piling Limited
Plaintiff (by Original Action); 1st Defendant (by Counterclaim)
Cheerwide Limited
Defendant (by Original Action); Plaintiff (by Counterclaim)
Alliance Architects Limited
2nd Defendant (by Counterclaim)
Chiu Sung Kin
3rd Defendant (by Counterclaim)
Procedural Posture
Construction and Arbitration Proceedings / Trial (judgment Delivered 10 January 2024)
Legal Issues
- 1 Entitlement to 95% of the Contract Sum
- 2 Which version of the Varied Contractor Agreement is the true contract
- 3 Whether the contract is void for uncertainty
Ratio Decidendi
The Varied Contractor Agreement produced by Wah Sung/Alliance (including the Excepted List and Initial Approved Plans) was the true contract; it was not void for uncertainty. Many Additional Works were outside the VCA and authorised by Alliance and/or ratified or acquiesced in by Cheerwide (actual and ostensible authority), so Wah Sung was entitled to payment for agreed additional works (HK$34,300,469.25) and quantum meruit items (HK$730,533.70) together with levies, administrative fee, HD payments and delay losses. Cheerwide’s counterclaims against Wah Sung, Alliance and Chiu failed; Chiu owed no personal tortious duty. The judge applied objective contractual construction principles, the...
Court Disposition
Judgment entered for Wah Sung; Cheerwide’s counterclaims against Wah Sung, Alliance and Chiu dismissed; final sum awarded to Wah Sung HKD22,974,308.29; Chiu not liable personally.
Orders
- Judgment in favour of Wah Sung Construction & Piling Limited against Cheerwide Limited in the sum of HKD22,974,308.29.
- Interest order nisi: interest on HKD22,974,308.29 at prime plus one from writ date 14 September 2020 to judgment date and at judgment rate thereafter until payment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment