RE RIGHT TIME CONSTRUCTION CO LTD
Payments made to the respondent after presentation of the winding-up petition were dispositions of company property within s.182 and are void; the court refused to validate the payments because the respondent knew of the companys insolvency, the payments reduced assets available to unsecured creditors, were not in...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- RE RIGHT TIME CONSTRUCTION CO LTD
- Parties
- Applicants/joint Liquidators: T. B. Stevenson; W. K. Timso; A. K. P. Yung (Joint Liquidators, Ernst & Whinney); Company/in Liquidation: Right Time Construction Company Limited (In Liquidation); Respondent/sub Contractor: Wong Kwong Kee trading as Wong Kwong Kee (Engineering); Petitioner/creditor: Bank of Tokyo Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 1988
- Case Number
- HCCW97/1987
- Procedural Posture
- Companies Winding Up / Chambers Application by Joint Liquidators for Declaration/validation Order After Presentation of Petition and After Winding Up Order
- Outcome
- Declaration that challenged payments are void under s.182; liquidators entitled to recover the sum of $208,781; order nisi for costs on a common fund basis.
- Legal Topics
- Void Dispositions Under S.182 Companies Ordinance, Validation Orders, Fraudulent Preference (s.266), Priority of Unsecured Creditors
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
T. B. Stevenson; W. K. Timso; A. K. P. Yung (Joint Liquidators, Ernst & Whinney)
Applicants/joint Liquidators
Right Time Construction Company Limited (In Liquidation)
Company/in Liquidation
Wong Kwong Kee trading as Wong Kwong Kee (Engineering)
Respondent/sub Contractor
Bank of Tokyo Limited
Petitioner/creditor
Procedural Posture
Companies Winding Up / Chambers Application by Joint Liquidators for Declaration/validation Order After Presentation of Petition and After Winding Up Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether payments made after presentation of petition constituted dispositions of company property and were void under s.182 of the Companies Ordinance
- 2 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to validate those payments
- 3 Whether the payments amounted to a fraudulent preference under s.266 (alternative, not actively pursued)
Ratio Decidendi
Payments made to the respondent after presentation of the winding-up petition were dispositions of company property within s.182 and are void; the court refused to validate the payments because the respondent knew of the companys insolvency, the payments reduced assets available to unsecured creditors, were not in the ordinary course of business and there was no justification for preferring the respondent.
Court Disposition
Declaration that challenged payments are void under s.182; liquidators entitled to recover the sum of $208,781; order nisi for costs on a common fund basis.
Orders
- Declaration that the two payments are void under s.182 of the Companies Ordinance
- Order that the respondent pay the sum of HKD 208781 to the joint liquidators
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment