RE NEW SHINE GROUP LTD (Company Number 2806482)
The Court found no arguable basis that the Applicant's claim was a liquidated debt; the claim arose from breach of contract and thus sounded in damages. Granting an adjournment would unduly prejudice other creditors by delaying the liquidation. Accordingly the adjournment application and the summons were dismissed.
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 1104
- Parties
- Applicant / Creditor: Aron Resource Enterprise Limited; Creditor (in Liquidation) / Respondent: New Winning Finance Company Limited (In Liquidation); Creditor (in Liquidation) / Respondent: Lamtex Holding Limited (In Liquidation); Company (in Liquidation) / Subject Company: New Shine Group Limited; Joint and Several Provisional Liquidator: Alan Cheung Hok Hin
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 16 April 2024
- Case Number
- HCCW321/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Companies Winding Up Proceedings / Decision on Summons (application for Adjournment and Declarations)
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed; application for adjournment dismissed; costs to be determined at a further hearing.
- Legal Topics
- Voting Rights of Creditors, Liquidated Versus Unliquidated Debt, Appointment of Liquidators, Adjournment, Procedural Prejudice
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aron Resource Enterprise Limited
Applicant / Creditor
New Winning Finance Company Limited (In Liquidation)
Creditor (in Liquidation) / Respondent
Lamtex Holding Limited (In Liquidation)
Creditor (in Liquidation) / Respondent
New Shine Group Limited
Company (in Liquidation) / Subject Company
Alan Cheung Hok Hin
Joint and Several Provisional Liquidator
Procedural Posture
Companies Winding Up Proceedings / Decision on Summons (application for Adjournment and Declarations)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Applicant's debt is a liquidated debt for voting purposes
- 2 Whether the Applicant was entitled to vote at the creditors' meeting of 2 December 2022 and at future meetings
- 3 Whether the resolution nominating joint and several liquidators was valid
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found no arguable basis that the Applicant's claim was a liquidated debt; the claim arose from breach of contract and thus sounded in damages. Granting an adjournment would unduly prejudice other creditors by delaying the liquidation. Accordingly the adjournment application and the summons were dismissed.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed; application for adjournment dismissed; costs to be determined at a further hearing.
Orders
- Application for adjournment dismissed
- Summons dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment