VIZCARRA, BRENDA V v. WONG WAI PING

VIZCARRA, BRENDA V v. WONG WAI PING

Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to identify any question of law; the appeal merely disputed findings of fact by the Adjudication Officer concerning termination and payment of wages, which does not justify appellate intervention.

Citation
VIZCARRA, BRENDA V v. WONG WAI PING
Parties
Claimant/appellant: VIZCARRA, BRENDA V; Defendant/respondent: WONG WAI PING
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
24 January 2000
Case Number
HCME9/1999
Procedural Posture
Minor Employment Claims (appeal From Mb1455/1999) / Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Leave to appeal refused.
Legal Topics
Wages, Wages in Lieu of Notice, Termination, Leave to Appeal, Findings of Fact Vs Law
Source Language
EN
Employment Law Civil Procedure Appeal Wages Wages in Lieu of Notice Termination Leave to Appeal Findings of Fact Vs Law

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

VIZCARRA, BRENDA V

Claimant/appellant

WONG WAI PING

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Minor Employment Claims (appeal From Mb1455/1999) / Application for Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there is a question of law warranting leave to appeal
  2. 2 Whether findings of fact by the Adjudication Officer can be impugned on appeal
  3. 3 Whether alleged deprivation of wages by a third party gives rise to an employment or contractual claim

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to identify any question of law; the appeal merely disputed findings of fact by the Adjudication Officer concerning termination and payment of wages, which does not justify appellate intervention.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal refused.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal refused.