CHUNG WO SANG, FUTURE v. TAI LIN RADIO SERVICE LTD
The Court of Appeal granted leave because the appeal raises a question of law of general public importance: whether on true construction the commission was payable only at the employer's discretion without regard to s.70 Employment Ordinance and contra proferentem, and whether contractual discretion is subject to a...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- CHUNG WO SANG, FUTURE v. TAI LIN RADIO SERVICE LTD
- Parties
- Claimant/employee: Chung Wo Sang; Defendant/employer: Tai Lin Radio Service Ltd
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2003
- Case Number
- HCMP3042/2003
- Procedural Posture
- Employment/labour Tribunal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted on a question of law of general public importance
- Legal Topics
- Wages and Commission, Construction of Employment Contracts, Discretionary Bonuses/commission, Employment Ordinance S.70, Contra Proferentem Rule, Judicial Review of Contractual Discretion
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chung Wo Sang
Claimant/employee
Tai Lin Radio Service Ltd
Defendant/employer
Procedural Posture
Employment/labour Tribunal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether commission forms part of 'wages' for purposes of annual leave, holiday pay and sickness allowance under the Employment Ordinance
- 2 Whether commission was payable only at the employer's discretion under the contract documents
- 3 Whether s.70 of the Employment Ordinance and the contra proferentem rule should affect construction of the documents
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal granted leave because the appeal raises a question of law of general public importance: whether on true construction the commission was payable only at the employer's discretion without regard to s.70 Employment Ordinance and contra proferentem, and whether contractual discretion is subject to a rationality standard; the judge below did not address s.70 or contra proferentem and appellate consideration of the Clark principle is required.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted on a question of law of general public importance
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted on the question formulated in paragraph 15 of the reasons
- Costs to be in the cause of the appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment