R. v. WAI KIN FUN
The magistrate's acceptance of PW1's evidence that the appellant was driving at excessive speed and in a manner creating an obvious and serious risk was dispositive; on those findings the appellant was properly convicted of exceeding the speed limit and reckless driving and the appeal must be dismissed.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- R. v. WAI KIN FUN
- Parties
- Crown: THE QUEEN; Appellant: WAI KIN FUN
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 1994
- Case Number
- HCMA271/1994
- Procedural Posture
- Magistracy Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; convictions and sentences upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Reckless Driving, Speeding, Evidence Witness Credibility, Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
THE QUEEN
Crown
WAI KIN FUN
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Magistracy Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was the driver of the vehicle on the Tolo Highway
- 2 Whether the appellant exceeded the statutory speed limit
- 3 Whether the appellant drove in a manner creating an obvious and serious risk (reckless driving)
Ratio Decidendi
The magistrate's acceptance of PW1's evidence that the appellant was driving at excessive speed and in a manner creating an obvious and serious risk was dispositive; on those findings the appellant was properly convicted of exceeding the speed limit and reckless driving and the appeal must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; convictions and sentences upheld.
Orders
- Convicted of reckless driving: fined HKD 2,000 and disqualified from driving for 12 months
- Convicted of driving in excess of the speed limit: fined HKD 3,000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment