HKSAR v. WANG BANG GUI

HKSAR v. WANG BANG GUI

The magistrate did not err in principle or impose a manifestly excessive sentence; having adopted a 15‑month starting point and reduced it to 10 months for the guilty plea the sentence was within proper sentencing discretion and is therefore affirmed.

Citation
HKSAR v. WANG BANG GUI
Parties
Respondent: HKSAR; Appellant: WANG BANG GUI
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
5 March 2003
Case Number
HCMA49/2003
Procedural Posture
Magistracy Appeal (court of First Instance on Appeal From TMCC 3679/2002) / Hearing and Judgment on Appeal (5 March 2003)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Using Forged Identity Card, Sentence Starting Point, Plea Discount, Magistracy Appeal
Source Language
EN
Criminal Law Forgery Immigration Law Sentencing Using Forged Identity Card Sentence Starting Point Plea Discount Magistracy Appeal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

HKSAR

Respondent

WANG BANG GUI

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Magistracy Appeal (court of First Instance on Appeal From TMCC 3679/2002) / Hearing and Judgment on Appeal (5 March 2003)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence of 10 months was wrong in principle or manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether the magistrate erred in adopting a starting point of 15 months
  3. 3 Whether the proprietor's capacity to offer employment affects commission of the offence

Ratio Decidendi

The magistrate did not err in principle or impose a manifestly excessive sentence; having adopted a 15‑month starting point and reduced it to 10 months for the guilty plea the sentence was within proper sentencing discretion and is therefore affirmed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Sentence of 10 months' imprisonment affirmed