香港特別行政區 訴 王大大
Leave to appeal against sentence was granted because there were arguable legal questions as to whether the indicated aggregate sentence (97.5 months) was manifestly excessive and whether the trial judge misapplied the observation in The Queen v Tong Hoi Fung when elevating individual baseline sentences, making the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] HKCA 150
- Parties
- Applicant: Wang DADA (王大大); Respondent: Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 2 February 2021
- Case Number
- CACC122/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence Appeal / Leave to Appeal Granted
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal against sentence granted
- Legal Topics
- Burglary (入屋犯法), Illegal Entry (非法入境), Totality Principle, Consecutive Vs Concurrent Sentences
- Source Language
- ch
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wang DADA (王大大)
Applicant
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence Appeal / Leave to Appeal Granted
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the aggregate sentencing indication of 97.5 months was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether sentences for multiple counts of burglary and illegal entry must be fully consecutive when the overall sentence reaches a certain length
- 3 Whether the trial judge erred in elevating each burglary baseline to 33 months by misreading The Queen v Tong Hoi Fung [1988] 1 HKLR 610 (611 I–J)
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal against sentence was granted because there were arguable legal questions as to whether the indicated aggregate sentence (97.5 months) was manifestly excessive and whether the trial judge misapplied the observation in The Queen v Tong Hoi Fung when elevating individual baseline sentences, making the matter fit for appellate consideration.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal against sentence granted
Orders
- Leave to appeal against sentence granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
CACC 122/2020 [2021] HKCA 150 香港特別行政區 高等法院上訴法庭 刑事司法管轄權 不服刑罰上訴許可申請 刑事上訴案件2020年第122號 (原區域法院刑事案件2020年第339號) __________________ 答辯人 香港特別行政區 對 申請人 Wang DADA (王大大) __________________ 主審法官: 高等法院上訴法庭法官彭偉昌 聆訊日期: 2021年2月2日 判案日期: 2021年2月2日 判 案 書 申請人承認九項‘入屋犯法’(相隔九天的兩次連環爆竊,涉及九間商舖和贓款贓物超過港幣十四萬元)和一項‘非法入境’,被處入獄共65個月。 上述判刑指向一個97.5個月(或8年1個月)的總量刑基準;這是否明顯過重是合理可供辯的:見香港特別行政區訴陳慶南 CACC 213/2019。 相關議題一:‘入屋犯法’和‘非法入境’的刑期,在整體刑期具一定長度時是否仍需全部分期執行。 相關議題二:原審法官把每項‘入屋犯法’的量刑基準提升至33個月,是否誤解了The Queen v Tong Hoi Fung [1988] 1 HKLR 610 (於611 I至J)的一個觀察。 我批准申請人就他的刑期進行上訴。 (彭偉昌) 高等法院上訴法庭法官 申請人: 無律師代表, 親自應訊 答辯人: 由律政司高級檢控官潘藹蓮女士代表